Standard classifications describe what a company files as, not what it's a bet on. This is a curated list of the Agriculture & Food names in our US universe: the pure-plays, plus the larger companies for which Agriculture & Food is a real, reported driver rather than a passing mention. Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site (how it's built), and re-scores every trading day.
| # | Ticker | Company | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CFChemicals | CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 73.2 |
| 2 | POSTFood & Beverage | Post Holdings, Inc. | 65.9 |
| 3 | ANDEFood & Beverage | The Andersons, Inc. | 64.9 |
| 4 | DARFood & Beverage | Darling Ingredients Inc. | 64.1 |
| 5 | LWFood & Beverage | Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 60.0 |
| 6 | INGRFood & Beverage | Ingredion Incorporated | 59.4 |
| 7 | MDLZFood & Beverage | Mondelez International, Inc. | 57.7 |
| 8 | NTRChemicals | Nutrien Ltd. | 52.8 |
| 9 | ADMFood & Beverage | Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 51.9 |
| 10 | AGCOMachinery & Equipment | AGCO Corporation | 49.8 |
| 11 | HRLFood & Beverage | Hormel Foods Corporation | 47.7 |
| 12 | DEMachinery & Equipment | Deere & Company | 45.8 |
| 13 | TSNFood & Beverage | Tyson Foods, Inc. | 45.3 |
| 14 | CTVAChemicals | Corteva, Inc. | 42.8 |
| 15 | BGFood & Beverage | Bunge Global SA | 40.5 |
| 16 | KHCFood & Beverage | The Kraft Heinz Company | 37.1 |
| 17 | CALMFood & Beverage | Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. | 36.2 |
| 18 | MOSChemicals | The Mosaic Company | 34.9 |
| 19 | CAGFood & Beverage | Conagra Brands, Inc. | 23.7 |
| 20 | GISFood & Beverage | General Mills, Inc. | 22.1 |
The 20 members report under 6 different industries, which is exactly why no standard sector view groups them:
Average pillar scores across the 20 scored members, against every stock the model scores:
| Pillar | Agriculture & Food | Market | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 56.7 | 56.5 | in line |
| Growth | 46.7 | 58.8 | 12.1 below |
| Value | 49.6 | 44.8 | 4.8 above |
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers. A low Value reading means the group is expensive relative to what it earns, not that the businesses are weak — for an early-stage theme that is the normal shape.
Scores across the group run from CF at 73.2 down to GIS at 22.1, with a median of 48.8. A theme is a thesis, not a quality filter — membership says a company is exposed to Agriculture & Food, and the score says what the model makes of the business.
Across the 20 Agriculture & Food names with a reading, the median forward earnings estimate is being cut — -1.2% over 90 days, behind the market (+0.3%). 5 of 20 are being revised up, 10 down.
Forward earnings estimates implied by price ÷ forward P/E, both captured at the same moment each trading day since June 2026, so a moving share price does not move these figures — only a changed forecast does. Estimate direction is not part of the Bull Rankings score. Biggest movers across the market →