WEEKLY ANALYSIS · Published July 22, 2026

Biggest stock score movers — week of July 22, 2026

In one line: TTD led the week (+13.7). The biggest week-over-week gainers and decliners on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, across every US-listed stock the model scores — with each name's Quality/Growth/Value pillars.

Biggest score movers · July 15, 2026 → July 22, 2026

Every US-listed common stock carries one 0–100 Bull Rankings quality-growth score, recomputed daily. These are the names whose score moved most over the past week across the whole scored universe — a rising score means the model sees a stronger, faster, or cheaper business than it did a week ago; a falling one, the reverse. The score is what changed; the pillar note says where each name stands today.

Biggest gainers

  • TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. · Advertising Agencies — score 72.0 → 85.7 (+13.7). Strongest on Growth (93/100), weakest on Value (78/100).
  • FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG · Medical Care Facilities — score 65.3 → 72.4 (+7.1). Strongest on Value (79/100), weakest on Quality (75/100).
  • PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc. · Information Technology Services — score 39.2 → 45.0 (+5.8). Strongest on Growth (66/100), weakest on Value (26/100).
  • PAYX Paychex, Inc. · Software - Application — score 68.9 → 74.5 (+5.6). Strongest on Quality (90/100), weakest on Value (51/100).
  • GEV GE Vernova Inc. · Specialty Industrial Machinery — score 54.8 → 60.3 (+5.5). Strongest on Quality (81/100), weakest on Value (51/100).
  • GLW Corning Incorporated · Electronic Components — score 44.9 → 49.7 (+4.8). Strongest on Growth (84/100), weakest on Value (24/100).
  • SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company · Specialty Chemicals — score 49.7 → 54.5 (+4.8). Strongest on Quality (78/100), weakest on Value (42/100).
  • CSX CSX Corporation · Railroads — score 45.0 → 49.7 (+4.7). Strongest on Quality (78/100), weakest on Value (26/100).

Biggest decliners

  • INIO Innio N.V. · Specialty Industrial Machinery — score 60.0 → 30.0 (-30.0). Strongest on Growth (100/100), weakest on Value (0/100).
  • IQMX IQM Quantum Computers Oyj · Computer Hardware — score 56.5 → 27.1 (-29.4). Strongest on Growth (100/100), weakest on Quality (0/100).
  • NOG Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. · Oil & Gas E&P — score 54.9 → 39.9 (-15.0). Strongest on Quality (44/100), weakest on Value (34/100).
  • AXON Axon Enterprise, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense — score 51.2 → 39.5 (-11.7). Strongest on Growth (100/100), weakest on Value (19/100).
  • XPRO Expro Ltd · Oil & Gas Equipment & Services — score 49.6 → 38.2 (-11.4). Strongest on Value (71/100), weakest on Growth (15/100).
  • ABT Abbott Laboratories · Medical Devices — score 67.0 → 59.3 (-7.7). Strongest on Growth (70/100), weakest on Value (45/100).
  • FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. · Copper — score 46.8 → 39.7 (-7.1). Strongest on Quality (79/100), weakest on Value (16/100).
  • MAN ManpowerGroup Inc. · Staffing & Employment Services — score 45.4 → 39.6 (-5.8). Strongest on Quality (43/100), weakest on Growth (35/100).

How to read this

The score blends three pillars — Quality (durable returns on capital, margins, low leverage, clean earnings), Growth (revenue and earnings expansion), and Value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number; see how the model works. Score moves come from fresh financials (a new quarterly filing), price moves that change the valuation pillar, or both. A one-week move is an observation, not a recommendation — open any name for its full grade card and reverse-DCF read. Not investment advice; see terms. Explore every score on the screener, or see this week's Top Picks.

Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.