P/E 33.9 — expensive vs Basic Materials peers (≈90th pctile)
PEG0.48proxyA
PEG 0.48 — exceptional; paying well under fair value for growth · PEG proxy: P/E ÷ revenue growth % (true PEG requires forward EPS estimates, not in Finnhub free tier).
Forward price target — the 1-year figure is the analyst consensus where the stock is covered; the 5- and 10-year figures compound our earnings estimate from there. The DCF below is a separate cross-check on intrinsic value (what it's worth today), not another target.
Quality-growth score · 66.7
Quality0.80
Growth0.50
Value0.74
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Cyclical growth
Entry · Margin of safety
52-week rangeMid-range
16% off the 12-month high
vs DCF fair value53% aboveest. fair value ~$157
What the price assumes: free cash flow compounding at ~17% a year for the next decade — vs the ~10% a year our model projects from current growth and analyst estimates.
Quality signals · context only
Gross profitability16% · C+gross profit ÷ total assets (Novy-Marx)
ROIC13.9% · B+return on invested capital — not score-weighted
Model-generatedGenerated by the Bull Rankings model from this company's reported fundamentals, and checked against the figures shown above.
Why now
Gold · market cap $42.2b. 16% off the 52-week high of $285.67. Revenue growing +64% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.48 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $277.17 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 61% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 134% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. P/S 23.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Horizon
1-3 yr $277.17 (9-analyst consensus) — fundamentals + valuation re-rating. 5 yr $405.80 at ~11% CAGR — compounding case rests on the competitive position widening. 10 yr $601.97 if current growth sustains into durable earnings power.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
FNV vs the Top Picks average
Pillar
FNV
Book avg
Diff
Quality
0.80
0.83
-0.03
Growth
0.50
0.92
-0.42
Value
0.74
0.75
in line
Averaged across the 30 names in today's Top Picks (mean score 82.4). A name can beat these averages and still be absent from the book — it also applies concentration limits.
Score history · FNV
Trend
+23.7 over 35 daily scores
From 43.0 (Jun 22) → 66.7 (now)
One point per daily model run. The range autoscales, so a flat-looking line can still hide 1–2 point moves — read the From → To values for the actual range.
Position sizing · FNV
$
%
%
Shares to buy
8
Position size
$1,927
3.9% of portfolio
Stop price
$180.68
25% below $240.90
$ at risk if stopped
$481.80
budget $500.00 · 1% of portfolio
Math only — share count is floor(portfolio × risk% ÷ (price × stop%)). Doesn't account for commissions, slippage, gap risk, or position-correlation across your book. Inputs persist locally; never sent to the server. Not investment advice.
Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is a Gold company that scores 66.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth model — a solid, above-average reading. The score blends three pillars — quality (durable returns, healthy margins, low leverage), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number, refreshed daily; it is a screen, not a buy recommendation.
Its strongest graded signals are Rev (A) and PEG (A). On valuation, FNV sits about 53% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value — the current price implies roughly 17% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade.
Is FNV a good stock to buy?
Bull Rankings scores FNV 66.7 out of 100 on its quality-growth model, which is a solid, above-average reading. That is driven by Rev (A) and PEG (A). A score is a quantitative screen of Franco-Nevada Corporation's fundamentals, not personalised financial advice — weigh it against your own time horizon and risk tolerance, and read the risk factors below before acting.
Why does FNV score 66.7 on Bull Rankings?
The quality-growth score blends three pillars — quality (returns on capital, margins, leverage, earnings quality), growth (revenue and earnings expansion), and value (valuation versus sector peers). FNV earns its highest marks on Rev (A) and PEG (A). Each pillar is graded against sector-aware thresholds, then combined into the single 0–100 score.
Is FNV overvalued or undervalued?
Based on $240.90, FNV sits about 53% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value — the current price implies roughly 17% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade. It trades at a 33.9x× P/E (graded C). Discounted-cash-flow estimates are sensitive to growth and discount-rate assumptions, so treat this as a cross-check, not a price target.
What are the main risks of investing in FNV?
Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. P/S 23.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Bull Rankings is an automated fundamentals screen for research and education. It is not investment advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Do your own research and consider consulting a licensed financial adviser.