D/E 0.84 — above the Communication Services debt median (≈75th pctile)
P/S6.9xC
P/S 6.9x — expensive vs Communication Services peers (≈90th pctile)
PEG3.42D
PEG 3.42 — very expensive; pricing in best-case scenarios
Forward price target — the 1-year figure is the analyst consensus where the stock is covered; the 5- and 10-year figures compound our earnings estimate from there. The DCF below is a separate cross-check on intrinsic value (what it's worth today), not another target.
Quality-growth score · 32.8
Quality0.26
Growth0.91
Value0.15
Entry · Margin of safety
52-week rangeNear 52-week high
7% off the 12-month high
vs DCF fair value320% aboveest. fair value ~$59
What the price assumes: free cash flow compounding at ~54% a year for the next decade — vs the ~25% a year our model projects from current growth and analyst estimates.
Quality signals · context only
Gross profitability41% · A-gross profit ÷ total assets (Novy-Marx)
ROIC-1.3% · Freturn on invested capital — not score-weighted
Model-generatedGenerated by the Bull Rankings model from this company's reported fundamentals, and checked against the figures shown above.
Why now
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia · market cap $46.1b. 7% off the 52-week high of $265.94. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 29 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $284.14 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -4.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -8% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Horizon
1-3 yr $284.14 (29-analyst consensus) — catalyst-driven; binary events dominate. 5 yr $496.96 — requires the platform / technology to reach commercial scale. 10 yr $888.17 — return distribution heavily skewed.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
TTWO vs the Top Picks average
Pillar
TTWO
Book avg
Diff
Quality
0.26
0.83
-0.57
Growth
0.91
0.92
in line
Value
0.15
0.75
-0.60
Averaged across the 30 names in today's Top Picks (mean score 82.4). A name can beat these averages and still be absent from the book — it also applies concentration limits.
Score history · TTWO
Trend
+1.6 over 37 daily scores
From 31.2 (Jun 22) → 32.8 (now)
One point per daily model run. The range autoscales, so a flat-looking line can still hide 1–2 point moves — read the From → To values for the actual range.
Position sizing · TTWO
$
%
%
Shares to buy
8
Position size
$1,972
3.9% of portfolio
Stop price
$184.88
25% below $246.50
$ at risk if stopped
$493.00
budget $500.00 · 1% of portfolio
Math only — share count is floor(portfolio × risk% ÷ (price × stop%)). Doesn't account for commissions, slippage, gap risk, or position-correlation across your book. Inputs persist locally; never sent to the server. Not investment advice.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO): score, valuation & FAQ
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) is a Electronic Gaming & Multimedia company that scores 32.8 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth model — a weak reading. The score blends three pillars — quality (durable returns, healthy margins, low leverage), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number, refreshed daily; it is a screen, not a buy recommendation.
Its strongest graded signals are Rev (B+), while PEG (D) rate weaker. On valuation, TTWO sits about 320% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value — the current price implies roughly 54% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade.
Is TTWO a good stock to buy?
Bull Rankings scores TTWO 32.8 out of 100 on its quality-growth model, which is a weak reading. That is driven by Rev (B+). A score is a quantitative screen of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.'s fundamentals, not personalised financial advice — weigh it against your own time horizon and risk tolerance, and read the risk factors below before acting.
Why does TTWO score 32.8 on Bull Rankings?
The quality-growth score blends three pillars — quality (returns on capital, margins, leverage, earnings quality), growth (revenue and earnings expansion), and value (valuation versus sector peers). TTWO earns its highest marks on Rev (B+), and is held back by PEG (D). Each pillar is graded against sector-aware thresholds, then combined into the single 0–100 score.
Is TTWO overvalued or undervalued?
Based on $246.50, TTWO sits about 320% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value — the current price implies roughly 54% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade. Discounted-cash-flow estimates are sensitive to growth and discount-rate assumptions, so treat this as a cross-check, not a price target.
What are the main risks of investing in TTWO?
Currently unprofitable (margin -4.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -8% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Bull Rankings is an automated fundamentals screen for research and education. It is not investment advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Do your own research and consider consulting a licensed financial adviser.