Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TTWO scored 27.1, OPRA scored 74.5 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. TTWO's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but OPRA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia · Quality-Growth
27.1
$213.44 · $39.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
47.4
OPRA leads
OPRA
Opera Limited
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
74.5
$17.58 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthOPRA+27.9%
Strongest balance sheetOPRA0.01
Highest qualityOPRA69 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueOPRA-30%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TTWO
stronger →← stronger
OPRA
26
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
82
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
95
9
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
63
OPRA is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TTWO
OPRA
$338mC
FCF
$112mC
+15.3%B+
Rev
+27.9%A-
0.82B
D/E
0.01A
6.0xC
P/S
—
2.87C
PEG
0.55A-
—
P/E
12.1xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TTWO
OPRA
507% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
30% below
~59%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
-86%
1-yr DCF upside
+11%
-84%
5-yr DCF upside
+43%
-80%
10-yr DCF upside
+108%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia · market cap $39.9b. 20% off the 52-week high of $265.94. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 29 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $286.44 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -4.8%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -9% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
OPRAOpera Limited
Internet Content & Information · $17.58 · beta 1.20
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.6b. 15% off the 52-week high of $20.78. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.55 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Dividend payout 86% of earnings on a 4.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TTWO and OPRA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 47.4 points in favor of OPRA. The widest single difference is Value, where OPRA leads by 53.6 points.
ValueTTWO 9.4 · OPRA 63.0OPRA +53.6
QualityTTWO 25.6 · OPRA 68.9OPRA +43.3
GrowthTTWO 82.1 · OPRA 95.4OPRA +13.3
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is OPRA or TTWO the better stock?
OPRA scores higher: OPRA 74.5, TTWO 27.1 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do OPRA and TTWO differ most?
The widest gap is value, where OPRA leads by 54 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. OPRA leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are OPRA and TTWO scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.