D/E 5.75 — most levered decile in Consumer Cyclical (≈95th pctile)
P/E47.7xD
P/E 47.7 — most expensive decile in Consumer Cyclical (≈95th pctile)
PEG0.31A
PEG 0.31 — exceptional; paying well under fair value for growth
Forward price target — the 1-year figure is the analyst consensus where the stock is covered; the 5- and 10-year figures compound our earnings estimate from there. The DCF below is a separate cross-check on intrinsic value (what it's worth today), not another target.
Quality-growth score · 68.4
Quality0.80
Growth0.76
Value0.53
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Entry · Margin of safety
52-week rangeNear 52-week high
3% off the 12-month high
vs DCF fair value38% aboveest. fair value ~$113
What the price assumes: free cash flow compounding at ~16% a year for the next decade — vs the ~12% a year our model projects from current growth and analyst estimates.
Quality signals · context only
Gross profitability92% · Agross profit ÷ total assets (Novy-Marx)
ROIC22.8% · Areturn on invested capital — not score-weighted
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $31.6b. 3% off the 52-week high of $161.97. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.31 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.15 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
ROE 97% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 5.75 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.46 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Horizon
1-3 yr $167.15 (20-analyst consensus) — fundamentals + valuation re-rating. 5 yr $244.72 at ~9% CAGR — compounding case rests on the competitive position widening. 10 yr $363.03 if current growth sustains into durable earnings power.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
TPR vs the Top Picks average
Pillar
TPR
Book avg
Diff
Quality
0.80
0.83
-0.03
Growth
0.76
0.91
-0.15
Value
0.53
0.75
-0.21
Averaged across the 30 names in today's Top Picks (mean score 81.8). A name can beat these averages and still be absent from the book — it also applies concentration limits.
Score history · TPR
Trend
+7.4 over 34 daily scores
From 61.0 (Jun 22) → 68.4 (now)
One point per daily model run. The range autoscales, so a flat-looking line can still hide 1–2 point moves — read the From → To values for the actual range.
Position sizing · TPR
$
%
%
Shares to buy
12
Position size
$1,876
3.8% of portfolio
Stop price
$117.24
25% below $156.31
$ at risk if stopped
$468.94
budget $500.00 · 1% of portfolio
Math only — share count is floor(portfolio × risk% ÷ (price × stop%)). Doesn't account for commissions, slippage, gap risk, or position-correlation across your book. Inputs persist locally; never sent to the server. Not investment advice.
Tapestry, Inc. (TPR): score, valuation & FAQ
Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) is a Luxury Goods company that scores 68.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth model — a solid, above-average reading. The score blends three pillars — quality (durable returns, healthy margins, low leverage), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number, refreshed daily; it is a screen, not a buy recommendation.
Its strongest graded signals are PEG (A) and Rev (B+), while D/E (D) and P/E (D) rate weaker. On valuation, TPR sits about 38% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value — the current price implies roughly 16% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade.
Is TPR a good stock to buy?
Bull Rankings scores TPR 68.4 out of 100 on its quality-growth model, which is a solid, above-average reading. That is driven by PEG (A) and Rev (B+). A score is a quantitative screen of Tapestry, Inc.'s fundamentals, not personalised financial advice — weigh it against your own time horizon and risk tolerance, and read the risk factors below before acting.
Why does TPR score 68.4 on Bull Rankings?
The quality-growth score blends three pillars — quality (returns on capital, margins, leverage, earnings quality), growth (revenue and earnings expansion), and value (valuation versus sector peers). TPR earns its highest marks on PEG (A) and Rev (B+), and is held back by D/E (D) and P/E (D). Each pillar is graded against sector-aware thresholds, then combined into the single 0–100 score.
Is TPR overvalued or undervalued?
Based on $156.31, TPR sits about 38% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value — the current price implies roughly 16% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade. It trades at a 47.7x× P/E (graded D). Discounted-cash-flow estimates are sensitive to growth and discount-rate assumptions, so treat this as a cross-check, not a price target.
What are the main risks of investing in TPR?
D/E 5.75 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.46 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Bull Rankings is an automated fundamentals screen for research and education. It is not investment advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Do your own research and consider consulting a licensed financial adviser.