TEAM vs the Top Picks average
| Pillar | TEAM | Book avg | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 0.37 | 0.84 | -0.47 |
| Growth | 0.92 | 0.87 | +0.05 |
| Value | 0.35 | 0.76 | -0.41 |
Averaged across the 30 names in today's Top Picks (mean score 81.5). A name can beat these averages and still be absent from the book — it also applies concentration limits.
One point per daily model run. The range autoscales, so a flat-looking line can still hide 1–2 point moves — read the From → To values for the actual range.
Analyst estimate revisions
| 30-day change | +10.2% |
|---|---|
| 90-day change | +8.8% |
| Forward EPS estimate | $6.75 |
Over the last 90 days, what analysts expect TEAM to earn is materially higher (+8.8%). The estimate is derived from price and forward P/E captured at the same instant, so a moving share price does not move this number — only a changed forecast does.
A rising estimate means expectations are improving, not that the price has failed to keep up — and estimates get cut as readily as they get raised. It is not part of the Bull Rankings score. Biggest movers across the market →
Math only — share count is floor(portfolio × risk% ÷ (price × stop%)). Doesn't account for commissions, slippage, gap risk, or position-correlation across your book. Inputs persist locally; never sent to the server. Not investment advice.
Atlassian Corporation (TEAM): score, valuation & FAQ
Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is a Software - Application company that scores 49.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth model — a below-average reading. The score blends three pillars — quality (durable returns, healthy margins, low leverage), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number, refreshed daily; it is a screen, not a buy recommendation.
Its strongest graded signals are Rev (A-). On valuation, TEAM sits about 46% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value — the current price implies roughly 24% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade.
Is TEAM a good stock to buy?
Bull Rankings scores TEAM 49.4 out of 100 on its quality-growth model, which is a below-average reading. That is driven by Rev (A-). A score is a quantitative screen of Atlassian Corporation's fundamentals, not personalised financial advice — weigh it against your own time horizon and risk tolerance, and read the risk factors below before acting.
Why does TEAM score 49.4 on Bull Rankings?
The quality-growth score blends three pillars — quality (returns on capital, margins, leverage, earnings quality), growth (revenue and earnings expansion), and value (valuation versus sector peers). TEAM earns its highest marks on Rev (A-). Each pillar is graded against sector-aware thresholds, then combined into the single 0–100 score.
Is TEAM overvalued or undervalued?
Based on $171.33, TEAM sits about 46% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value — the current price implies roughly 24% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade. Discounted-cash-flow estimates are sensitive to growth and discount-rate assumptions, so treat this as a cross-check, not a price target.
What are the main risks of investing in TEAM?
Atlassian is running a thin -0.8% profit margin and a negative -5.1% ROE, reflecting ongoing investment and pricing pressure; its debt‑to‑equity of 1.16 adds leverage risk if cash conversion falters. The Bull Rankings model flags Value as the weakest pillar, suggesting the current price already assumes aggressive 24% FCF growth—any slowdown below the 26% revenue pace would trigger a sharp re‑rating. A sustained margin contraction or a rise in debt would confirm the bear case.
New to these metrics? The guides explain free cash flow, how the score works, and more in the learn hub — or run another name through the screener.
Bull Rankings is an automated fundamentals screen for research and education. It is not investment advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Do your own research and consider consulting a licensed financial advisor.