D/E 1.41 — more levered than most Technology peers (≈90th pctile)
P/S3.7xB+
P/S 3.7x — below the Technology median (≈40th pctile)
PEG0.65A-
PEG 0.65 — strong; Lynch's preferred zone
Forward price target — the 1-year figure is the analyst consensus where the stock is covered; the 5- and 10-year figures compound our earnings estimate from there. The DCF below is a separate cross-check on intrinsic value (what it's worth today), not another target.
Quality-growth score · 62.3
Quality0.32
Growth0.99
Value0.76
Entry · Margin of safety
52-week rangeNear 52-week low
59% off the 12-month high
vs DCF fair value14% aboveest. fair value ~$80
Quality signals · context only
Gross profitability92% · Agross profit ÷ total assets (Novy-Marx)
ROIC-9.7% · Freturn on invested capital — not score-weighted
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $23.0b. Down 59% from 52-week high of $220.30 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +20%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.65 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 30 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $139.87 (implying +54% upside).
Moat
Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -3.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 59% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -25% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Horizon
1-3 yr $139.87 (30-analyst consensus) — catalyst-driven; binary events dominate. 5 yr $244.63 — requires the platform / technology to reach commercial scale. 10 yr $620.37 — return distribution heavily skewed.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Position sizing · TEAM
$
%
%
Shares to buy
22
Position size
$1,996
4.0% of portfolio
Stop price
$68.03
25% below $90.71
$ at risk if stopped
$498.90
budget $500.00 · 1% of portfolio
Math only — share count is floor(portfolio × risk% ÷ (price × stop%)). Doesn't account for commissions, slippage, gap risk, or position-correlation across your book. Inputs persist locally; never sent to the server. Not investment advice.
Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is a Software - Application company that scores 62.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth model — a middling reading. The score blends three pillars — quality (durable returns, healthy margins, low leverage), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number, refreshed daily; it is a screen, not a buy recommendation.
Its strongest graded signals are PEG (A-), Rev (B+) and P/S (B+). On valuation, TEAM sits about 14% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value (i.e. the DCF flags it as rich).
Is TEAM a good stock to buy?
Bull Rankings scores TEAM 62.3 out of 100 on its quality-growth model, which is a middling reading. That is driven by PEG (A-), Rev (B+) and P/S (B+). A score is a quantitative screen of Atlassian Corporation's fundamentals, not personalised financial advice — weigh it against your own time horizon and risk tolerance, and read the risk factors below before acting.
Why does TEAM score 62.3 on Bull Rankings?
The quality-growth score blends three pillars — quality (returns on capital, margins, leverage, earnings quality), growth (revenue and earnings expansion), and value (valuation versus sector peers). TEAM earns its highest marks on PEG (A-), Rev (B+) and P/S (B+). Each pillar is graded against sector-aware thresholds, then combined into the single 0–100 score.
Is TEAM overvalued or undervalued?
Based on $90.71, TEAM sits about 14% above our discounted-cash-flow fair value (i.e. the DCF flags it as rich). Discounted-cash-flow estimates are sensitive to growth and discount-rate assumptions, so treat this as a cross-check, not a price target.
What are the main risks of investing in TEAM?
Currently unprofitable (margin -3.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 59% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -25% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Bull Rankings is an automated fundamentals screen for research and education. It is not investment advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Do your own research and consider consulting a licensed financial adviser.