COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
ADSK vs TEAM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADSK scored 81.7, TEAM scored 49.4 — ADSK leads.
Compare another set
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
81.7
$254.42 · $53.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
32.3
ADSK leads
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation
49.4
$171.33 · $43.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthTEAM+26.0%
- Strongest balance sheetADSK0.85
- Highest qualityADSK88 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADSK
stronger →← stronger
TEAM
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
37
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
92
72
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
35
ADSK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADSK
TEAM
$2.7bB
FCF
$1.3bC+
+18.3%B+
Rev
+26.0%A-
0.85C+
D/E
1.16C
37.1xB
P/E
—
0.97B+
PEG
1.80C+
—
P/S
6.6xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADSK
TEAM
33% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% above
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~24%/yr
-34%
1-yr DCF upside
-47%
-25%
5-yr DCF upside
-31%
-11%
10-yr DCF upside
+1%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADSK
Why this score
- Durable high returns
TEAM
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
ADSKAutodesk, Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $53.7b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $329.09 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.97 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 34 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $314.57 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 46% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 187% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
TEAMAtlassian Corporation
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $43.4b. 7% off the 52-week high of $184.00. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 30 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $188.77 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -0.8%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Customer concentration — many software businesses depend on a handful of enterprise accounts; the loss of one $10M+ contract can swing the next quarter's growth narrative.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADSK and TEAM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 32.3 points in favor of ADSK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityADSK 87.9 · TEAM 37.3ADSK +50.6
- ValueADSK 72.1 · TEAM 35.1ADSK +37.0
- GrowthADSK 85.9 · TEAM 92.1TEAM +6.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.