Bull Rankings model

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) stock analysis

Oil & Gas E&P. Scored on the same transparent model behind the daily rankings.

★
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc. · Oil & Gas E&P
47.2Score
$192.13Oct 9 close$53.8B
1Y Target$234.66Analyst consensus · 29 analysts
5Y Target$343.56Compound horizon
10Y Target$509.65Long-dated conviction
FCF$3.7bTTM · 06/26
B
FCF $3.7b — solid, comfortably covers operations and capital return · Trailing twelve months to 06/26 (operating cash flow − capex).
Rev+21.4%TTM YoY
A-
Revenue +21.4% — strong growth, well above S&P median (~7%) · Latest four quarters of revenue vs the four before them, from SEC filings.
D/E0.29
A-
D/E 0.29 — less debt than most Energy peers (≈25th pctile)
P/E36.6x
C
P/E 36.6 — expensive vs Energy peers (≈90th pctile)
PEG21.24
D
PEG 21.24 — very expensive; pricing in best-case scenarios

Targets: 1-year is analyst consensus where covered, 5- and 10-year are model estimates; the DCF is a cross-check, not a target. Methodology

Quality-growth score · 47.2
Quality59.6
Growth50.0
Value35.2
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
  • Cyclical growth
Entry · Margin of safety
52-week rangeNear 52-week high
11% off the 12-month high
vs DCF fair value57% belowest. fair value ~$451
What the price assumes: free cash flow shrinking about 7% next year, then recovering toward 4% a year by year ten — vs a starting rate of ~21% our model takes as the middle of three readings — analyst estimates, last year's revenue growth, and the company's own multi-year record.
Quality signals
ROIC1.7% · Creturn on invested capital — leads the quality score

Model-generatedWritten from the fundamentals then; figures in the text are as of that day, today's are above · Editorial standards

Why now
Diamondback’s unmatched position in the Permian Basin’s Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations fuels a revenue surge of 21.4% YoY, while its free‑cash‑flow of $3.7 B and ultra‑low debt‑to‑equity of 0.29 give it the financial firepower to keep buying back shares and raising the dividend. Our Bull Rankings model awards a Quality‑growth score of 37.4, with Quality as the strongest pillar, underscoring the durability of its low‑cost, high‑yield assets. The thesis rests on the premise that this operational edge will keep compounding cash flow well above the modest 2% growth baked into today’s price.
Moat
Diamondback’s moat is its deep, low‑cost acreage in the Permian’s Spraberry and Wolfcamp plays, where the company’s on‑shore drilling expertise translates into superior net cash returns that rivals can’t replicate without massive capital outlays. The concentration in these high‑productivity formations locks in a cost advantage that sustains margins around 8.6% despite commodity swings.
Risk
The stock trades at a lofty PE of 36.3 and a Value pillar of only 18, signaling that the market has already priced in a steep premium; the reverse DCF shows the price assumes just 2% free‑cash‑flow growth in year 1, far below the 21.4% revenue growth just delivered. A slowdown to the implied growth rate would crush the valuation cushion, and the weak ROE of 3.9% offers little defensive upside. Confirmation of the bear case would be a sustained drop in cash‑flow growth below 2% and a widening of the PE multiple.
Horizon
1-3 yr $234.66 (29-analyst consensus) — fundamentals + valuation re-rating. 5 yr $343.56 at ~12% CAGR — compounding case rests on the competitive position widening. 10 yr $509.65 if current growth sustains into durable earnings power.

FANG vs the Top Picks average

PillarFANGBook avgDiff
Quality6083-23
Growth5089-39
Value3576-41

Average of today's Top 30 (mean score 82.6); size and sector limits also decide the book.

Trend
+26.1 over 82 daily scores
From 21.1 (Jun 22) → 47.2 (now)

One point per daily run; read From → To for the actual range.

FANG at a glance

THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD47.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY59.6GROWTH50.0VALUE35.2Reverse-DCF · Price implies roughly no growth from here.
PRICE vs OUR DCF FAIR VALUE$359$639FAIR-VALUE RANGE$192PRICEOur DCF fair value ~$451 · price $192 is 57% below it.
ONE-YEAR MOVE VS ITS BETAFLATThis stock+37%Trailing one-year price change. Price history is not an inputto the Bull Rankings score.
PRICE IN ITS 52-WEEK RANGE$192LOW $137HIGH $217Trading at the 69th percentile of its 52-week range ($137–$217).

Same audited fundamentals as the score, unless a card says otherwise.

Analyst estimate revisions

30-day change+3.6%
90-day change+7.9%
Forward EPS estimate$18.74

Over the last 90 days, what analysts expect FANG to earn is materially higher (+7.9%). The estimate is derived from price and forward P/E captured at the same instant, so a moving share price does not move this number — only a changed forecast does.

Estimates move both ways and are not part of the Bull Rankings score. Biggest movers →

Shares to buy
10
Position size
$1,921
3.8% of portfolio
Stop price
$144.10
25% below $192.13
$ at risk if stopped
$480.32
budget $500.00 · 1% of portfolio

Math only: excludes commissions, slippage and gap risk. Inputs stay in your browser.

The Bull Rankings deep dive

Analysis as of · figures are as written that day and are not updated. Today's numbers are in the cards above.

Written by the Bull Rankings model from fundamentals as of , and checked against those figures. How we source & verify every figure →

The Bull Rankings scorecard — our quality-growth score is 36.9 / 100, built from three pillars scored 0–100: Quality 60, Growth 50, Value 17 (valuation is judged against sector peers). At today's price, our reverse-DCF read says the market is implicitly betting on free-cash-flow growth of about 4% a year next year, fading to 3% a year by year ten — a gauge of how much optimism is already in the stock.

THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD36.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY59.8GROWTH50.0VALUE16.8Reverse-DCF · Price implies ~4% growth a year from here.

The thesis

ANALYST RECOMMENDATIONS4205Strong buyBuyHoldSTRONG_BUY29 analysts: 83% rate it a buy. Sell-side opinion is not aninput to the Bull Rankings score.

The market gives FANG a rich earnings multiple, and the quality numbers go some way toward explaining it. In the quarter ended 2026-06-30, revenue grew 21.4% year over year while the company generated $3.7b in free cash flow — a figure that puts it in rare company among E&P peers. Our model’s Quality-growth score of 36.9/100, anchored by a Quality pillar of 60, tells us the business is solid, though not that it earns its premium multiple. The weakest pillar, Value at 17, is the obvious chink in the armor, but the cash-flow math is gentler than the multiple: the market isn’t extrapolating a one-off surge.

What the business actually is

REVENUE TO CASHRevenue$17.1b · 100%Net income$1.5b · 8.6%Free cash flow$3.7b · 21.5%Cash flow exceeds reported profit — high-quality earnings.

Diamondback drills in the Permian Basin, specifically the Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations in the Midland Basin and the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations in the Delaware Basin. These are unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves, and the company’s entire revenue engine runs on developing them. No refineries, no retail stations — just the unglamorous work of turning rock into barrels. The Permian’s stacked pay zones give Diamondback multiple bites at the apple, and the scale of the basin means the company can keep drilling even as prices gyrate.

Why it can (or can't) keep compounding

The durability case hinges on the quality of the assets and the discipline of the capital program. Our model flags Buying back stock as a key signal, which suggests the company is returning cash to shareholders rather than chasing growth at any cost. That discipline is rare in the E&P space, where capital tends to follow the cycle. The profit margin of 8.6% in the latest quarter shows the business can still squeeze out returns even when oil prices slip, and the debt-to-equity of 0.29 means it isn’t levering up to fund growth. The moat isn’t a patent or a brand; it’s the Permian’s geology and Diamondback’s operational edge. No rival can replicate a decade of drilling data and infrastructure overnight.

The valuation question

The stock trades at 38.1 times trailing earnings, and our reverse DCF says the price implies 4% annual free-cash-flow growth (in year one, slowing to 3% a year by year ten). That’s a modest assumption when revenue grew 21.4% last year. The PEG ratio of 20.62, tells a different story: on earnings, the multiple is very high for the little profit growth analysts expect. The analyst consensus target of $232.54 implies a 16% upside from today’s $200.52, but that target assumes the cycle stays benign and capital discipline doesn’t waver. The reverse-DCF read suggests the stock is priced for a sharp slowdown.

The bear case

The weakest pillar in our model is Value, and the numbers explain why. At 38.1 times earnings, FANG looks expensive on profits, even if the cash-flow math is gentler. The return on equity of 3.9% is pedestrian for a growth stock, even though $3.7b of free cash flow is a healthy yield on a $56.1b company. If oil prices slip or drilling costs rise, the margin could evaporate. The analysts’ strong buy consensus with a mean recommendation of 1.48 suggests analysts are chasing the stock, not questioning it. That’s a red flag. The signal that would confirm the bear case? A sustained drop in profit margins below 7% or a halt to buybacks.

What would change our mind

BULL SCORE OVER TIME36.9Jun 22Aug 27Ranged 21–37 over 50 trading days · now 36.9 (up +15.8).

Three things would flip the thesis. First, if the profit margin fell below 7%, it would show the Permian’s edge isn’t as durable as priced in. Second, if the company stopped buying back stock, it would signal capital discipline is cracking. Third, if the revenue growth slipped below 10% for two straight quarters, the compounding story would lose credibility. Until then, the market’s bet on FANG is a bet on the Permian staying productive and management staying disciplined.

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG): score, valuation & FAQ

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is an Oil & Gas E&P company that scores 47.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth model — a below-average reading. The score blends three pillars — quality (durable returns, healthy margins, low leverage), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number, refreshed daily; it is a screen, not a buy recommendation.

Its strongest graded signals are Rev (A-) and D/E (A-), while PEG (D) rate weaker. On valuation, FANG sits about 57% below our discounted-cash-flow fair value (a margin of safety) — the current price implies free cash flow shrinking about 7% next year, then recovering toward 4% a year by year ten.

Is FANG a good stock to buy?

Bull Rankings scores FANG 47.2 out of 100 on its quality-growth model, which is a below-average reading. That is driven by Rev (A-) and D/E (A-). A score is a quantitative screen of Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s fundamentals, not personalised financial advice — weigh it against your own time horizon and risk tolerance, and read the risk factors below before acting.

Why does FANG score 47.2 on Bull Rankings?

The score leans on quality at 59.6 out of 100, with value the weakest pillar at 35.2 — the three combine geometrically, so a weak one cannot be papered over by a strong one. FANG earns its highest marks on Rev (A-) and D/E (A-), and is held back by PEG (D). Each signal is graded against sector-aware thresholds rather than one absolute bar, so FANG is measured against Oil & Gas E&P peers, not against the market as a whole.

Is FANG overvalued or undervalued?

Based on $192.13, FANG sits about 57% below our discounted-cash-flow fair value (a margin of safety) — the current price implies free cash flow shrinking about 7% next year, then recovering toward 4% a year by year ten. It trades at a 36.6x P/E (graded C). Discounted-cash-flow estimates are sensitive to growth and discount-rate assumptions, so treat this as a cross-check, not a price target.

What are the main risks of investing in FANG?

The stock trades at a lofty PE of 36.3 and a Value pillar of only 18, signaling that the market has already priced in a steep premium; the reverse DCF shows the price assumes just 2% free‑cash‑flow growth in year 1, far below the 21.4% revenue growth just delivered. A slowdown to the implied growth rate would crush the valuation cushion, and the weak ROE of 3.9% offers little defensive upside. Confirmation of the bear case would be a sustained drop in cash‑flow growth below 2% and a widening of the PE multiple.

New to these metrics? See the guides and the methodology.

More Oil & Gas — E&P stocks by score

All Energy rankings →

Analyze another ticker →