PAM vs the Top Picks average
| Pillar | PAM | Book avg | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 49 | 83 | -34 |
| Growth | 70 | 89 | -19 |
| Value | 58 | 76 | -18 |
Average of today's Top 30 (mean score 82.6); size and sector limits also decide the book.
One point per daily run; read From → To for the actual range.
PAM at a glance
Same audited fundamentals as the score, unless a card says otherwise.
Analyst estimate revisions
| 30-day change | -0.7% |
|---|---|
| 90-day change | -14.6% |
| Forward EPS estimate | $11.74 |
Over the last 90 days, what analysts expect PAM to earn is materially lower (-14.6%). The estimate is derived from price and forward P/E captured at the same instant, so a moving share price does not move this number — only a changed forecast does.
Estimates move both ways and are not part of the Bull Rankings score. Biggest movers →
Math only: excludes commissions, slippage and gap risk. Inputs stay in your browser.
Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM): score, valuation & FAQ
Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) is a Conglomerates company that scores 58.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth model — a middling reading. The score blends three pillars — quality (durable returns, healthy margins, low leverage), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number, refreshed daily; it is a screen, not a buy recommendation.
Its strongest graded signals are PEG (A-) and P/S (B+), while FCF (F) rate weaker.
Is PAM a good stock to buy?
Bull Rankings scores PAM 58.2 out of 100 on its quality-growth model, which is a middling reading. That is driven by PEG (A-) and P/S (B+). A score is a quantitative screen of Pampa Energía S.A.'s fundamentals, not personalised financial advice — weigh it against your own time horizon and risk tolerance, and read the risk factors below before acting.
Why does PAM score 58.2 on Bull Rankings?
The score leans on growth at 69.8 out of 100, with quality the weakest pillar at 48.9 — the three combine geometrically, so a weak one cannot be papered over by a strong one. PAM earns its highest marks on PEG (A-) and P/S (B+), and is held back by FCF (F). Each signal is graded against sector-aware thresholds rather than one absolute bar, so PAM is measured against Conglomerates peers, not against the market as a whole.
Is PAM overvalued or undervalued?
We don't compute a reliable discounted-cash-flow value for PAM — typically because it is not yet consistently profitable or free-cash-flow positive — so its valuation rests on growth and price-to-sales rather than on earnings-based intrinsic value. Judge it on the trajectory of the business, not a single multiple.
What are the main risks of investing in PAM?
Free cash flow is negative (-$455m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
New to these metrics? See the guides and the methodology.