P/E 19.3 — below the Consumer Cyclical median (≈40th pctile)
PEG1.15B+
PEG 1.15 — near fair value, classic Lynch benchmark (1.0)
Forward price target — the 1-year figure is the analyst consensus where the stock is covered; the 5- and 10-year figures compound our earnings estimate from there. The DCF below is a separate cross-check on intrinsic value (what it's worth today), not another target.
Quality-growth score · 65.4
Quality0.92
Growth0.50
Value0.61
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
Cyclical growth
Entry · Margin of safety
52-week rangeNear 52-week low
31% off the 12-month high
vs DCF fair value47% belowest. fair value ~$92
What the price assumes: free cash flow compounding at ~-6% a year for the next decade — vs the ~14% a year our model projects from current growth and analyst estimates.
Quality signals · context only
ROIC23.1% · Areturn on invested capital — not score-weighted
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $31.7b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $70.45 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $59.07 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 157% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Horizon
1-3 yr $59.07 (19-analyst consensus) — fundamentals + valuation re-rating. 5 yr $86.48 at ~12% CAGR — compounding case rests on the competitive position widening. 10 yr $128.29 if current growth sustains into durable earnings power.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
LVS vs the Top Picks average
Pillar
LVS
Book avg
Diff
Quality
0.92
0.82
+0.10
Growth
0.50
0.90
-0.40
Value
0.61
0.75
-0.14
Averaged across the 30 names in today's Top Picks (mean score 81.8). A name can beat these averages and still be absent from the book — it also applies concentration limits.
Score history · LVS
Trend
+0.3 over 32 daily scores
From 64.9 (Jun 22) → 65.2 (now)
One point per daily model run. The range autoscales, so a flat-looking line can still hide 1–2 point moves — read the From → To values for the actual range.
Position sizing · LVS
$
%
%
Shares to buy
40
Position size
$1,956
3.9% of portfolio
Stop price
$36.67
25% below $48.89
$ at risk if stopped
$488.90
budget $500.00 · 1% of portfolio
Math only — share count is floor(portfolio × risk% ÷ (price × stop%)). Doesn't account for commissions, slippage, gap risk, or position-correlation across your book. Inputs persist locally; never sent to the server. Not investment advice.
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS): score, valuation & FAQ
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) is a Resorts & Casinos company that scores 65.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth model — a solid, above-average reading. The score blends three pillars — quality (durable returns, healthy margins, low leverage), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number, refreshed daily; it is a screen, not a buy recommendation.
Its strongest graded signals are Rev (B+), P/E (B+) and PEG (B+). On valuation, LVS sits about 47% below our discounted-cash-flow fair value (a margin of safety) — the current price implies roughly -6% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade.
Is LVS a good stock to buy?
Bull Rankings scores LVS 65.4 out of 100 on its quality-growth model, which is a solid, above-average reading. That is driven by Rev (B+), P/E (B+) and PEG (B+). A score is a quantitative screen of Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s fundamentals, not personalised financial advice — weigh it against your own time horizon and risk tolerance, and read the risk factors below before acting.
Why does LVS score 65.4 on Bull Rankings?
The quality-growth score blends three pillars — quality (returns on capital, margins, leverage, earnings quality), growth (revenue and earnings expansion), and value (valuation versus sector peers). LVS earns its highest marks on Rev (B+), P/E (B+) and PEG (B+). Each pillar is graded against sector-aware thresholds, then combined into the single 0–100 score.
Is LVS overvalued or undervalued?
Based on $48.89, LVS sits about 47% below our discounted-cash-flow fair value (a margin of safety) — the current price implies roughly -6% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade. It trades at a 19.3x× P/E (graded B+). Discounted-cash-flow estimates are sensitive to growth and discount-rate assumptions, so treat this as a cross-check, not a price target.
What are the main risks of investing in LVS?
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Bull Rankings is an automated fundamentals screen for research and education. It is not investment advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Do your own research and consider consulting a licensed financial adviser.