Sprinklr, Inc. — Software - Application. Scored on the same transparent model behind the daily rankings.
★
CXM
Sprinklr, Inc. · Software - Application
FCF$144mC
Rev+8.1%B
D/E0.09B+
P/E55.6xC+
PEG0.70A-
70.3Score
$6.67$1.6B
1Y Target$7.88Analyst consensus · 8 analysts
5Y Target$11.53Compound horizon
10Y Target$17.10Long-dated conviction
FCF$144mTTMC
FCF $144m — modest; watch for margin expansion
Rev+8.1%TTM YoYB
Revenue +8.1% — at or above S&P median
D/E0.09B+
D/E 0.09 — below the Technology debt median (≈40th pctile)
P/E55.6xC+
P/E 55.6 — above the Technology median (≈75th pctile)
PEG0.70A-
PEG 0.70 — strong; Lynch's preferred zone
Forward price target — the 1-year figure is the analyst consensus where the stock is covered; the 5- and 10-year figures compound our earnings estimate from there. The DCF below is a separate cross-check on intrinsic value (what it's worth today), not another target.
Quality-growth score · 70.3
Quality0.65
Growth0.74
Value0.72
Why this score
Buying back stock
Entry · Margin of safety
52-week rangeMid-range
27% off the 12-month high
vs DCF fair value58% belowest. fair value ~$16
What the price assumes: free cash flow compounding at ~-12% a year for the next decade — vs the ~11% a year our model projects from current growth and analyst estimates.
Quality signals · context only
Gross profitability54% · Agross profit ÷ total assets (Novy-Marx)
ROIC8.5% · Breturn on invested capital — not score-weighted
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $1.6b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $9.20 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.70 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $7.88 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Trailing P/E 55.6x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 3.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Horizon
1-3 yr $7.88 (8-analyst consensus) — fundamentals + valuation re-rating. 5 yr $11.53 at ~12% CAGR — compounding case rests on the competitive position widening. 10 yr $17.10 if current growth sustains into durable earnings power.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
CXM vs the Top Picks average
Pillar
CXM
Book avg
Diff
Quality
0.65
0.84
-0.19
Growth
0.74
0.92
-0.18
Value
0.72
0.75
-0.03
Averaged across the 30 names in today's Top Picks (mean score 82.6). A name can beat these averages and still be absent from the book — it also applies concentration limits.
Score history · CXM
Trend
-0.5 over 8 daily scores
From 70.8 (Jun 22) → 70.3 (now)
One point per daily model run. The range autoscales, so a flat-looking line can still hide 1–2 point moves — read the From → To values for the actual range.
Position sizing · CXM
$
%
%
Shares to buy
299
Position size
$1,994
4.0% of portfolio
Stop price
$5.00
25% below $6.67
$ at risk if stopped
$498.58
budget $500.00 · 1% of portfolio
Math only — share count is floor(portfolio × risk% ÷ (price × stop%)). Doesn't account for commissions, slippage, gap risk, or position-correlation across your book. Inputs persist locally; never sent to the server. Not investment advice.
Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM): score, valuation & FAQ
Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) is a Software - Application company that scores 70.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth model — a solid, above-average reading. The score blends three pillars — quality (durable returns, healthy margins, low leverage), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (valuation versus sector peers) — into one number, refreshed daily; it is a screen, not a buy recommendation.
Its strongest graded signals are PEG (A-) and D/E (B+). On valuation, CXM sits about 58% below our discounted-cash-flow fair value (a margin of safety) — the current price implies roughly -12% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade.
Is CXM a good stock to buy?
Bull Rankings scores CXM 70.3 out of 100 on its quality-growth model, which is a solid, above-average reading. That is driven by PEG (A-) and D/E (B+). A score is a quantitative screen of Sprinklr, Inc.'s fundamentals, not personalised financial advice — weigh it against your own time horizon and risk tolerance, and read the risk factors below before acting.
Why does CXM score 70.3 on Bull Rankings?
The quality-growth score blends three pillars — quality (returns on capital, margins, leverage, earnings quality), growth (revenue and earnings expansion), and value (valuation versus sector peers). CXM earns its highest marks on PEG (A-) and D/E (B+). Each pillar is graded against sector-aware thresholds, then combined into the single 0–100 score.
Is CXM overvalued or undervalued?
Based on $6.67, CXM sits about 58% below our discounted-cash-flow fair value (a margin of safety) — the current price implies roughly -12% annual free-cash-flow growth over the next decade. It trades at a 55.6x× P/E (graded C+). Discounted-cash-flow estimates are sensitive to growth and discount-rate assumptions, so treat this as a cross-check, not a price target.
What are the main risks of investing in CXM?
Trailing P/E 55.6x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 3.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Bull Rankings is an automated fundamentals screen for research and education. It is not investment advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Do your own research and consider consulting a licensed financial adviser.