Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ZIM scored 58.7, ZTO scored 64.9 — ZTO leads.
Compare another set
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Marine Shipping · Quality-Growth
58.7
$29.99 · $3.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.2
ZTO leads
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · Quality-Growth
64.9
$20.15 · $15.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestZTO11.0x
Fastest growthZTO+10.9%
Strongest balance sheetZTO0.35
Highest qualityZTO76 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueZIM-84%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ZIM
stronger →← stronger
ZTO
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
44
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
81
ZTO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ZIM
ZTO
$2.1bB
FCF
$891mC+
-18.1%F
Rev
+10.9%B
1.37C
D/E
0.35A-
26.3xB
P/E
11.0xA
—
PEG
1.01B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ZIM
ZTO
84% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
decline
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
+597%
1-yr DCF upside
-6%
+522%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
+433%
10-yr DCF upside
+18%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ZIM
No notable signals flagged.
ZTO
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Foreign reporter (CNY)
The companies
ZIMZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Marine Shipping · $29.99 · beta 1.16
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $3.6b. 3% off the 52-week high of $30.96. Revenue -18% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $27.80 (implying -7% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
Revenue contracting -18% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $15.1b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $26.20 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $27.88 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ZIM and ZTO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.2 points in favor of ZTO. The widest single difference is Growth, where ZTO leads by 36.3 points.
GrowthZIM 43.5 · ZTO 79.8ZTO +36.3
ValueZIM 67.4 · ZTO 81.3ZTO +13.9
QualityZIM 69.0 · ZTO 76.3ZTO +7.3
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is ZTO or ZIM the better stock?
ZTO scores higher: ZTO 64.9, ZIM 58.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do ZTO and ZIM differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where ZTO leads by 36 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. ZTO leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are ZTO and ZIM scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.