COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
YETI vs YUMC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. YETI scored 67.9, YUMC scored 74.5 — YUMC leads.
Compare another set
YETI
YETI Holdings, Inc.
67.9
$43.76 · $3.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.6
YUMC leads
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
74.5
$49.52 · $16.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestYUMC18.1x
- Fastest growthYUMC+8.8%
- Strongest balance sheetYUMC0.38
- Highest qualityYETI90 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueYUMC-4%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
YETI
stronger →← stronger
YUMC
90
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
YETI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
YETI
YUMC
$257mC
FCF
$940mC+
+6.2%C+
Rev
+8.8%B
0.42A-
D/E
0.38A-
19.2xB
P/E
18.1xB
1.27B
PEG
1.19B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
YETI
YUMC
6% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
-17%
1-yr DCF upside
-9%
-6%
5-yr DCF upside
+4%
+11%
10-yr DCF upside
+28%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
YETI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
YUMC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
YETIYETI Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Leisure · market cap $3.2b. 19% off the 52-week high of $53.99. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.53 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.72 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
YUMCYum China Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $16.9b. 15% off the 52-week high of $58.39. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $62.05 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 96% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where YETI and YUMC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.6 points in favor of YUMC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthYETI 50.0 · YUMC 75.4YUMC +25.4
- QualityYETI 89.6 · YUMC 84.0YETI +5.6
- ValueYETI 69.9 · YUMC 65.3YETI +4.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.