COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
YETI vs YUM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. YETI scored 67.8, YUM scored 54.9 — YETI leads.
Compare another set
YETI
YETI Holdings, Inc.
67.8
$43.08 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.9
YETI leads
YUM
Yum! Brands, Inc.
54.9
$157.35 · $42.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestYETI19.2x
- Fastest growthYUM+10.3%
- Highest qualityYETI89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueYUM-9%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
YETI
stronger →← stronger
YUM
89
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
53
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
42
YETI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
YETI
YUM
$257mC
FCF
$1.7bC+
+6.2%C+
Rev
+10.3%B
0.42A-
D/E
—
19.2xB
P/E
19.3xB
1.27B
PEG
2.06C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
YETI
YUM
4% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
9% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
-15%
1-yr DCF upside
-3%
-4%
5-yr DCF upside
+9%
+13%
10-yr DCF upside
+32%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
YETI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
YUM
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
YETIYETI Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Leisure · market cap $3.1b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $53.99 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.53 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.72 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
YUMYum! Brands, Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $42.9b. 8% off the 52-week high of $170.14. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $173.38 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
ROE -31% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where YETI and YUM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.9 points in favor of YETI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueYETI 69.6 · YUM 42.3YETI +27.3
- QualityYETI 89.4 · YUM 73.5YETI +15.9
- GrowthYETI 50.0 · YUM 53.4YUM +3.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.