COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GPOR vs XOM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GPOR scored 64.5, XOM scored 55.6 — GPOR leads.
Compare another set
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
64.5
$173.45 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.9
GPOR leads
XOM
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
55.6
$167.72 · $689.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGPOR6.6x
- Fastest growthGPOR+35.2%
- Strongest balance sheetXOM0.16
- Highest qualityGPOR77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueGPOR-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GPOR
stronger →← stronger
XOM
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
48
GPOR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GPOR
XOM
$250mC
FCF
$30.6bA
+35.2%A
Rev
-4.5%D+
0.50B
D/E
0.16A
6.6xA
P/E
21.6xC+
0.36A
PEG
1.25B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GPOR
XOM
41% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
85% above
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~14%/yr
+38%
1-yr DCF upside
-40%
+68%
5-yr DCF upside
-46%
+124%
10-yr DCF upside
-53%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GPOR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
XOM
Why this score
- Revenue shrinking
- Short track record
The companies
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $3.1b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $227.08 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas Integrated · market cap $689.7b. 5% off the 52-week high of $176.41. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $168.55 (implying +0% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $689.7b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GPOR and XOM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.9 points in favor of GPOR. The widest single difference is Value, where GPOR leads by 21.9 points.
- ValueGPOR 70.0 · XOM 48.1GPOR +21.9
- QualityGPOR 76.6 · XOM 71.7GPOR +4.9
- GrowthGPOR 50.0 · XOM 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.