COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
VRT vs XE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. VRT scored 74.1, XE scored 68.1 — VRT leads.
Compare another set
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
74.1
$261.95 · $100.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.0
VRT leads
XE
X-Energy, Inc.
68.1
$18.67 · $7.6B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthVRT+26.2%
- Strongest balance sheetXE0.01
- Highest qualityXE98 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
VRT
stronger →← stronger
XE
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
98
91
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
52
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
VRT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
VRT
XE
$2.9bB
FCF
—
+26.2%A-
Rev
+12.2%B+
0.70B
D/E
0.01A
59.1xD
P/E
—
1.28B
PEG
—
—
P/S
50.5xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
VRT
XE
156% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~42%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-70%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-61%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-45%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
VRT
Why this score
- Durable high returns
XE
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
VRTVertiv Holdings Co
Why now
Electrical Equipment & Parts · market cap $100.8b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $379.94 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $338.15 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 59.1x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.08 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
XEX-Energy, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $7.6b. Down 50% from 52-week high of $37.10 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $38.00 (implying +104% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Down 50% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. P/S 50.5x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where VRT and XE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.0 points in favor of VRT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityVRT 86.1 · XE 98.3XE +12.2
- ValueVRT 52.0 · XE 40.0VRT +12.0
- GrowthVRT 90.8 · XE 80.3VRT +10.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.