Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. WHD scored 59.2, FTI scored 57.3 — WHD leads.
Compare another set
WHD
Cactus, Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · Quality-Growth
59.2
$63.43 · $4.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.9
WHD leads
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · Quality-Growth
57.3
$69.57 · $27.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestFTI24.2x
Fastest growthWHD+21.8%
Strongest balance sheetWHD0.03
Highest qualityFTI88 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueWHD-17%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
WHD
stronger →← stronger
FTI
84
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
49
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
43
WHD and FTI split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
WHD
FTI
$324mC
FCF
$1.6bC+
+21.8%A-
Rev
+9.9%B
0.03A
D/E
0.38B+
53.3xC
P/E
24.2xC+
2.35C
PEG
2.18C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
WHD
FTI
17% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~9%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
-4%
1-yr DCF upside
+4%
+21%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
+67%
10-yr DCF upside
+27%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $4.4b. 14% off the 52-week high of $74.07. Revenue growing +22%, comfortably above the S&P median. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $70.22 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 198% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trailing P/E 53.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.43 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $27.3b. 14% off the 52-week high of $80.70. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $76.00 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 134% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where WHD and FTI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.9 points in favor of WHD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueWHD 49.2 · FTI 42.9WHD +6.3
QualityWHD 84.3 · FTI 87.7FTI +3.4
GrowthWHD 50.0 · FTI 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is WHD or FTI the better stock?
WHD scores higher: WHD 59.2, FTI 57.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do WHD and FTI differ most?
The widest gap is value, where WHD leads by 6 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are WHD and FTI scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.