Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. WFC scored 75.0, BBVA scored 71.0 — WFC leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. WFC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BBVA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
Banks - Diversified · Financial strength
63.7Fin
$83.55 · $252.7B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
8.3
BBVA leads
BBVA
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Banks - Diversified · Financial strength
72Fin
$26.12 · $143.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestWFC11.9x
Fastest growthWFC+1.7%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
WFC
BBVA
+1.7%C
Rev
+0.5%C
11.9xB
P/E
11.9xB
12.6%B
ROE
18.9%B+
1.53B
P/B
2.29C+
2.4%B
Yield
4.1%B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
WFCWells Fargo & Company
Banks - Diversified · $83.55 · beta 0.95
Why now
Banks - Diversified · market cap $252.7b. 15% off the 52-week high of $97.76. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $99.02 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $252.7b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
BBVABanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Banks - Diversified · $26.12 · beta 0.90
Why now
Banks - Diversified · market cap $143.7b. 12% off the 52-week high of $29.64. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $27.53 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 33% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 19% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. $143.7b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Duration mismatch — the asset and liability books reprice on different schedules; a rapid move in rates either direction can compress net interest margin before management can reposition.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is WFC or BBVA the better stock?
WFC scores higher: WFC 75.0, BBVA 71.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are WFC and BBVA scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.