COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
WEN vs YETI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. WEN scored 37.2, YETI scored 67.8 — YETI leads.
Compare another set
WEN
The Wendy's Company
37.2
$8.84 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
30.6
YETI leads
YETI
YETI Holdings, Inc.
67.8
$43.08 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestWEN13.6x
- Fastest growthYETI+6.2%
- Highest qualityYETI89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueWEN-59%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
WEN
stronger →← stronger
YETI
65
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
13
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
YETI is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
WEN
YETI
$264mC
FCF
$257mC
-1.0%D+
Rev
+6.2%C+
—
D/E
0.42A-
13.6xA-
P/E
19.2xB
1.73C+
PEG
1.27B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
WEN
YETI
59% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% above
~-17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
+135%
1-yr DCF upside
-15%
+142%
5-yr DCF upside
-4%
+152%
10-yr DCF upside
+13%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
WEN
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
YETI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
WENThe Wendy's Company
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $1.7b. 17% off the 52-week high of $10.62. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $7.79 (implying -12% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
YETIYETI Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Leisure · market cap $3.1b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $53.99 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.53 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.72 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where WEN and YETI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 30.6 points in favor of YETI. The widest single difference is Growth, where YETI leads by 37.0 points.
- GrowthWEN 13.0 · YETI 50.0YETI +37.0
- QualityWEN 64.6 · YETI 89.4YETI +24.8
- ValueWEN 61.5 · YETI 69.6YETI +8.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.