COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
WB vs YELP
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. WB scored 61.0, YELP scored 74.2 — YELP leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. YELP's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but WB's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
WB
Weibo Corporation
61
$7.19 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.2
YELP leads
YELP
Yelp Inc.
74.2
$23.46 · $1.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestWB6.2x
- Fastest growthYELP+1.5%
- Strongest balance sheetYELP0.19
- Highest qualityYELP88 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueWB-78%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
WB
stronger →← stronger
YELP
72
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
39
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
53
81
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
YELP is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
WB
YELP
$477mC
FCF
$297mC
+0.1%C
Rev
+1.5%C
0.46B+
D/E
0.19A-
6.2xA
P/E
11.3xA-
0.79A-
PEG
0.57A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
WB
YELP
78% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
72% below
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
+324%
1-yr DCF upside
+248%
+364%
5-yr DCF upside
+254%
+427%
10-yr DCF upside
+262%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
WB
No notable signals flagged.
YELP
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
WBWeibo Corporation
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.8b. Down 45% from 52-week high of $12.96 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $8.60 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 106% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 45% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
YELPYelp Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.3b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $34.49 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.57 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $26.00 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where WB and YELP diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.2 points in favor of YELP. The widest single difference is Quality, where YELP leads by 16.1 points.
- QualityWB 72.0 · YELP 88.1YELP +16.1
- GrowthWB 39.0 · YELP 53.4YELP +14.4
- ValueWB 80.9 · YELP 86.7YELP +5.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.