COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
OPRA vs WB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OPRA scored 73.1, WB scored 61.0 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
OPRA
Opera Limited
73.1
$18.96 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.1
OPRA leads
WB
Weibo Corporation
61
$7.19 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestWB6.2x
- Fastest growthOPRA+27.9%
- Strongest balance sheetOPRA0.01
- Highest qualityWB72 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueWB-78%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OPRA
stronger →← stronger
WB
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
39
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
81
WB is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OPRA
WB
$112mC
FCF
$477mC
+27.9%A-
Rev
+0.1%C
0.01A
D/E
0.46B+
13.7xB+
P/E
6.2xA
0.54A-
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OPRA
WB
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
78% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
+18%
1-yr DCF upside
+324%
+54%
5-yr DCF upside
+364%
+128%
10-yr DCF upside
+427%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OPRA
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
WB
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
OPRAOpera Limited
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.7b. 10% off the 52-week high of $21.06. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 87% of earnings on a 4.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
WBWeibo Corporation
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.8b. Down 45% from 52-week high of $12.96 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $8.60 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 106% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 45% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OPRA and WB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.1 points in favor of OPRA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthOPRA 95.4 · WB 39.0OPRA +56.4
- ValueOPRA 59.0 · WB 80.9WB +21.9
- QualityOPRA 69.3 · WB 72.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.