Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. VTMX scored 81.0, CCS scored 73.0 — VTMX leads.
Compare another set
VTMX
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.
Real Estate - Diversified · Financial strength
82.3Fin
$34.30 · $3.2B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
8.2
VTMX leads
CCS
Century Communities, Inc.
Real Estate - Development · Financial strength
74.1Fin
$55.53 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthVTMX+12.2%
Strongest balance sheetVTMX0.37
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
VTMX
CCS
2.5%B
Yield
2.3%B
+12.2%B+
Rev
-8.9%D
0.37A
D/E
0.66A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
VTMXCorporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.
Real Estate - Diversified · $34.30 · beta 0.26
Why now
Real Estate - Diversified · market cap $3.2b. 8% off the 52-week high of $37.41. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $37.40 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
P/S 10.5x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
CCSCentury Communities, Inc.
Real Estate - Development · $55.53 · beta 1.28
Why now
Real Estate - Development · market cap $1.6b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $76.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -9% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Revenue contracting -9% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Net margin 3.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is VTMX or CCS the better stock?
VTMX scores higher: VTMX 81.0, CCS 73.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are VTMX and CCS scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.