COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
VSTS vs WLFC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. VSTS scored 33.4, WLFC scored 72.8 — WLFC leads.
Compare another set
VSTS
Vestis Corporation
33.4
$12.69 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
39.4
WLFC leads
WLFC
Willis Lease Finance Corp
72.8
$54.37 · $1.7B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthWLFC+28.4%
- Strongest balance sheetVSTS1.53
- Highest qualityWLFC55 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueWLFC-77%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
VSTS
stronger →← stronger
WLFC
42
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
55
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
90
63
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
78
WLFC is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
VSTS
WLFC
$136mC
FCF
$239mC
-0.4%D+
Rev
+28.4%A-
1.53C
D/E
4.12D
0.6xA
P/S
—
—
P/E
14.4xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
VSTS
WLFC
42% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
77% below
~1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-19%/yr
+31%
1-yr DCF upside
+224%
+71%
5-yr DCF upside
+328%
+154%
10-yr DCF upside
+552%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
VSTS
Why this score
- Short track record
WLFC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
VSTSVestis Corporation
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $1.7b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $16.90 — deep drawdown territory. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $13.00 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -0.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -1% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
WLFCWillis Lease Finance Corp
Why now
Trading Companies & Distributors · market cap $1.7b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $81.54 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory.
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
D/E 4.12 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where VSTS and WLFC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 39.4 points in favor of WLFC. The widest single difference is Growth, where WLFC leads by 76.2 points.
- GrowthVSTS 14.0 · WLFC 90.2WLFC +76.2
- ValueVSTS 63.3 · WLFC 78.2WLFC +14.9
- QualityVSTS 41.9 · WLFC 54.8WLFC +12.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.