COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
PRG vs VSTS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PRG scored 57.9, VSTS scored 33.4 — PRG leads.
Compare another set
PRG
PROG Holdings, Inc.
57.9
$38.77 · $1.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
24.5
PRG leads
VSTS
Vestis Corporation
33.4
$12.69 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthPRG+0.4%
- Strongest balance sheetPRG1.10
- Highest qualityPRG65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePRG-58%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PRG
stronger →← stronger
VSTS
65
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
42
45
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
63
PRG is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PRG
VSTS
$319mC
FCF
$136mC
+0.4%C
Rev
-0.4%D+
1.10C+
D/E
1.53C
12.5xA
P/E
—
0.93B+
PEG
—
—
P/S
0.6xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PRG
VSTS
58% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
42% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
+108%
1-yr DCF upside
+31%
+138%
5-yr DCF upside
+71%
+184%
10-yr DCF upside
+154%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PRG
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
VSTS
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
PRGPROG Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $1.5b. 19% off the 52-week high of $47.73. PEG 0.93 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $53.43 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Beta 1.79 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
VSTSVestis Corporation
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $1.7b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $16.90 — deep drawdown territory. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $13.00 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -0.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -1% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PRG and VSTS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 24.5 points in favor of PRG. The widest single difference is Growth, where PRG leads by 31.0 points.
- GrowthPRG 45.0 · VSTS 14.0PRG +31.0
- QualityPRG 64.9 · VSTS 41.9PRG +23.0
- ValuePRG 66.5 · VSTS 63.3PRG +3.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.