Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. VC scored 57.5, DORM scored 60.6 — DORM leads.
Compare another set
VC
Visteon Corporation
Auto Parts · Quality-Growth
57.5
$85.43 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.1
DORM leads
DORM
Dorman Products, Inc.
Auto Parts · Quality-Growth
60.6
$120.40 · $3.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestVC15.6x
Fastest growthDORM+6.0%
Strongest balance sheetVC0.26
Highest qualityDORM73 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
VC
stronger →← stronger
DORM
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
73
40
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
DORM is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
VC
DORM
$146mC
FCF
$214mC
-2.5%D+
Rev
+6.0%C+
0.26A-
D/E
0.35A-
15.6xB+
P/E
16.7xB
1.01B+
PEG
1.17B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
VC
DORM
19% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% above
~11%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
-20%
1-yr DCF upside
-10%
-16%
5-yr DCF upside
-8%
-9%
10-yr DCF upside
-4%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
VC
Why this score
Buying back stock
Durable high returns
DORM
Why this score
Buying back stock
Durable high returns
Cyclical growth
The companies
VCVisteon Corporation
Auto Parts · $85.43 · beta 1.30
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $2.3b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $126.95 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $122.50 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 102% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
DORMDorman Products, Inc.
Auto Parts · $120.40 · beta 1.02
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $3.6b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $164.00 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $161.63 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where VC and DORM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.1 points in favor of DORM. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
GrowthVC 40.3 · DORM 50.0DORM +9.7
ValueVC 68.6 · DORM 61.3VC +7.3
QualityVC 68.7 · DORM 72.5DORM +3.8
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is DORM or VC the better stock?
DORM scores higher: DORM 60.6, VC 57.5 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do DORM and VC differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where DORM leads by 10 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are DORM and VC scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.