COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

V vs ALLY

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. V scored 79.0, ALLY scored 82.0 — ALLY leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. ALLY's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but V's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
V
Visa Inc.
Credit Services · Financial strength
58.3Fin
$385.45 · $723.6B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
10.7
ALLY leads
ALLY
Ally Financial Inc.
Credit Services · Financial strength
69Fin
$37.59 · $11.4B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestALLY8.8x
  • Fastest growthV+14.4%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD58.3/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL58.3
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD69.0/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL69.0
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-11%24%3.8x38xVALLY

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFV$21.2bALLY$762m
RevV+14.4%ALLY-1.4%
P/EV32.8xALLY8.8x
PEGV1.70ALLY0.27
V
ALLY
$21.2bA
FCF
$762mC+
+14.4%B+
Rev
-1.4%D+
0.68B
D/E
—
32.8xD
P/E
8.8xA-
1.70C+
PEG
0.27A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
VVisa Inc.
Credit Services · $385.45 · beta 0.77
Why now
Credit Services · market cap $723.6b. Trading near 52-week high of $386.84 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 37 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $419.36 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
Net margin 52% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 62% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 95% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. P/S 16.8x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
ALLYAlly Financial Inc.
Credit Services · $37.59 · beta 1.10
Why now
Credit Services · market cap $11.4b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $47.29 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.27 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $49.73 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is ALLY or V the better stock?

ALLY scores higher: ALLY 82.0, V 79.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are ALLY and V scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.