COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
TGLS vs USLM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TGLS scored 60.2, USLM scored 52.0 — TGLS leads.
Compare another set
TGLS
Tecnoglass Holdings Inc.
60.2
$41.03 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.2
TGLS leads
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
52
$118.89 · $3.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthTGLS+9.9%
- Strongest balance sheetUSLM0.00
- Highest qualityUSLM88 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TGLS
stronger →← stronger
USLM
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
32
TGLS and USLM split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TGLS
USLM
-$9mF
FCF
$92mC-
+9.9%B
Rev
+7.0%C+
0.29B+
D/E
0.00A
1.7xB+
P/S
—
0.73A-
PEG
1.96C+
—
P/E
25.5xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TGLS
USLM
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
57% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-44%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-36%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TGLS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
USLM
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
TGLSTecnoglass Holdings Inc.
Why now
Building Materials · market cap $1.8b. Down 45% from 52-week high of $74.02 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.73 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $56.33 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$9m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 45% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
Why now
Building Materials · market cap $3.4b. 16% off the 52-week high of $141.44.
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TGLS and USLM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.2 points in favor of TGLS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueTGLS 59.0 · USLM 31.8TGLS +27.2
- QualityTGLS 74.0 · USLM 88.3USLM +14.3
- GrowthTGLS 50.0 · USLM 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.