COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ORLA vs USAS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ORLA scored 65.2, USAS scored 21.0 — ORLA leads.
Compare another set
ORLA
Orla Mining Ltd
65.2
$9.44 · $3.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
44.2
ORLA leads
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation
21
$5.39 · $1.8B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthORLA+207.6%
- Strongest balance sheetUSAS0.20
- Highest qualityORLA81 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueORLA-35%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ORLA
stronger →← stronger
USAS
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
22
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
68
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
8
ORLA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ORLA
USAS
$359mC
FCF
-$59mF
+207.6%A
Rev
+17.7%B+
0.42B
D/E
0.20B+
13.1xA-
P/E
—
1.34B
PEG
—
—
P/S
10.0xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ORLA
USAS
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~-4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+40%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+53%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+72%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ORLA
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
USAS
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
ORLAOrla Mining Ltd
Why now
Gold · market cap $3.5b. Down 57% from 52-week high of $21.98 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +208% — in hypergrowth territory.
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 42% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 57% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
USASAmericas Gold and Silver Corporation
Why now
Other Industrial Metals & Mining · market cap $1.8b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $10.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$59m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -26.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ORLA and USAS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 44.2 points in favor of ORLA. The widest single difference is Value, where ORLA leads by 60.0 points.
- ValueORLA 68.4 · USAS 8.4ORLA +60.0
- QualityORLA 81.0 · USAS 22.0ORLA +59.0
- GrowthORLA 50.0 · USAS 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.