COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026

CNR vs UROY

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CNR scored 46.0, UROY scored 44.6 — CNR leads.
Compare another set
CNR
Core Natural Resources, Inc.
Thermal Coal · Quality-Growth
46
$101.66 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.4
CNR leads
UROY
Uranium Royalty Corp.
Uranium · Quality-Growth
44.6
$4.43 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestUROY15.3x
  • Strongest balance sheetUROY0.00
  • Highest qualityUROY93 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueUROY-46%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD46.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY47.9GROWTH50.0VALUE40.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD44.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY93.4GROWTH10.0VALUE94.8
CNRUROYQuality47.993.4Growth50.010.0Value40.794.8
FCFCNR$260mUROY$178m
D/ECNR0.12UROY0.00
P/ECNR51.1xUROY15.3x
PEGCNR0.77UROY0.04
CNR
stronger →← stronger
UROY
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
93
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
10
41
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
95
UROY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CNR
UROY
$260mC
FCF
$178mC
+31.5%A
Rev
0.12A
D/E
0.00A
51.1xC
P/E
15.3xB
0.77A-
PEG
0.04A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CNR
UROY
17% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
-8%
1-yr DCF upside
+43%
+21%
5-yr DCF upside
+87%
+80%
10-yr DCF upside
+172%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CNR
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Cut its dividend
  • Cyclical growth
UROY
Why this score
  • Short track record
CNRCore Natural Resources, Inc.
Thermal Coal · $101.66 · beta 0.14
Why now
Thermal Coal · market cap $5.0b. 11% off the 52-week high of $114.80. Revenue growing +32% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.77 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $107.00 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 51.1x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
UROYUranium Royalty Corp.
Uranium · $4.43 · beta 1.40
Why now
Uranium · market cap $1.7b. 20% off the 52-week high of $5.52. PEG 0.04 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $4.12 (implying -7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 15% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CNR and UROY diverge

On the headline score the gap is 1.4 points in favor of CNR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.