COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
CCJ vs UROY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCJ scored 43.6, UROY scored 44.6 — UROY leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. UROY's fundamentals are as of April 2026, but CCJ's are as of December 2025 — a 4-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
43.6
$106.96 · $46.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.0
UROY leads
UROY
Uranium Royalty Corp.
44.6
$4.43 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestUROY15.3x
- Strongest balance sheetUROY0.00
- Highest qualityUROY93 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueUROY-46%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCJ
stronger →← stronger
UROY
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
93
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
10
29
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
95
UROY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCJ
UROY
$666mC+
FCF
$178mC
+11.0%B
Rev
—
0.17A-
D/E
0.00A
175.3xD
P/E
15.3xB
1.92C+
PEG
0.04A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCJ
UROY
196% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% below
~44%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
-74%
1-yr DCF upside
+43%
-66%
5-yr DCF upside
+87%
-49%
10-yr DCF upside
+172%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCJ
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
UROY
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
CCJCameco Corporation
Why now
Uranium · market cap $46.6b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $135.24 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $130.27 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 175.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. P/S 18.5x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
UROYUranium Royalty Corp.
Why now
Uranium · market cap $1.7b. 20% off the 52-week high of $5.52. PEG 0.04 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $4.12 (implying -7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 15% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCJ and UROY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.0 points in favor of UROY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCCJ 29.2 · UROY 94.8UROY +65.6
- GrowthCCJ 50.0 · UROY 10.0CCJ +40.0
- QualityCCJ 66.2 · UROY 93.4UROY +27.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.