Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. URI scored 45.6, MGRC scored 46.9 — MGRC leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. MGRC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but URI's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
URI
United Rentals, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · Quality-Growth
45.6
$1,056.37 · $65.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.3
MGRC leads
MGRC
McGrath RentCorp
Rental & Leasing Services · Quality-Growth
46.9
$113.64 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthURI+5.0%
Strongest balance sheetMGRC0.47
Highest qualityURI75 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
URI
stronger →← stronger
MGRC
75
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
30
20
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
URI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
URI
MGRC
$1.1bC+
FCF
-$7mF
+5.0%C+
Rev
-0.9%D+
1.67C
D/E
0.47B+
25.4xB
P/E
—
1.36B
PEG
1.04B+
—
P/S
3.0xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
URI
MGRC
404% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~56%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
—
-82%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-80%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-77%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
URI
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
MGRC
Why this score
Durable high returns
The companies
URIUnited Rentals, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · $1,056.37 · beta 1.83
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $65.8b. 10% off the 52-week high of $1179.18. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,266 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $65.8b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Beta 1.83 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
MGRCMcGrath RentCorp
Rental & Leasing Services · $113.64 · beta 0.47
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $2.8b. 10% off the 52-week high of $125.83. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $145.40 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$7m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where URI and MGRC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.3 points in favor of MGRC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
GrowthURI 65.1 · MGRC 30.1URI +35.0
ValueURI 19.5 · MGRC 52.6MGRC +33.1
QualityURI 74.7 · MGRC 65.1URI +9.6
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is MGRC or URI the better stock?
MGRC scores higher: MGRC 46.9, URI 45.6 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do MGRC and URI differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where URI leads by 35 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are MGRC and URI scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.