Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. URI scored 45.6, LIME scored 65.1 — LIME leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. LIME's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but URI's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
URI
United Rentals, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · Quality-Growth
45.6
$1,056.37 · $65.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.5
LIME leads
LIME
Neutron Holdings, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · Quality-Growth
65.1
$28.58 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestLIME5.6x
Fastest growthLIME+29.1%
Strongest balance sheetLIME0.20
Highest qualityURI75 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
URI
stronger →← stronger
LIME
75
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
54
20
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
74
URI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
URI
LIME
$1.1bC+
FCF
$40mC-
+5.0%C+
Rev
+29.1%A-
1.67C
D/E
0.20A-
25.4xB
P/E
5.6xA
1.36B
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
URI
LIME
404% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
98% above
~56%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~33%/yr
-82%
1-yr DCF upside
-61%
-80%
5-yr DCF upside
-49%
-77%
10-yr DCF upside
-26%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
URI
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
LIME
Why this score
Short track record
The companies
URIUnited Rentals, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · $1,056.37 · beta 1.83
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $65.8b. 10% off the 52-week high of $1179.18. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,266 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $65.8b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Beta 1.83 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
LIMENeutron Holdings, Inc.
Rental & Leasing Services · $28.58
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $1.8b. Down 36% from 52-week high of $44.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +29% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $39.43 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Down 36% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where URI and LIME diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.5 points in favor of LIME. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueURI 19.5 · LIME 73.9LIME +54.4
GrowthURI 65.1 · LIME 54.3URI +10.8
QualityURI 74.7 · LIME 68.9URI +5.8
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is LIME or URI the better stock?
LIME scores higher: LIME 65.1, URI 45.6 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do LIME and URI differ most?
The widest gap is value, where LIME leads by 54 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are LIME and URI scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.