COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
TPR vs URBN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TPR scored 65.7, URBN scored 68.4 — URBN leads.
Compare another set
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
65.7
$130.17 · $26.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.7
URBN leads
URBN
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
68.4
$74.24 · $6.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestURBN14.3x
- Fastest growthTPR+14.2%
- Strongest balance sheetURBN0.46
- Highest qualityTPR82 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TPR
stronger →← stronger
URBN
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
75
81
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
85
43
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
URBN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TPR
URBN
$1.8bC+
FCF
$150mC
+14.2%B+
Rev
+11.2%B
5.72D
D/E
0.46B+
17.9xB+
P/E
14.3xA-
1.89C+
PEG
1.38B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TPR
URBN
11% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
199% above
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~36%/yr
-19%
1-yr DCF upside
-69%
-10%
5-yr DCF upside
-67%
+3%
10-yr DCF upside
-63%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TPR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
URBN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
TPRTapestry, Inc.
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $26.0b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $164.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.40 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 5.72 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.46 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
URBNUrban Outfitters, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $6.4b. 12% off the 52-week high of $84.35. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $87.69 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TPR and URBN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.7 points in favor of URBN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueTPR 42.7 · URBN 50.1URBN +7.4
- QualityTPR 81.9 · URBN 75.1TPR +6.8
- GrowthTPR 81.1 · URBN 85.2URBN +4.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.