COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DVA vs UHS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DVA scored 68.9, UHS scored 69.1 — UHS leads.
Compare another set
DVA
DaVita Inc.
68.9
$173.82 · $11.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.2
UHS leads
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
69.1
$177.26 · $10.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestUHS7.2x
- Fastest growthUHS+10.0%
- Highest qualityDVA69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDVA-67%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DVA
stronger →← stronger
UHS
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
59
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
82
DVA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DVA
UHS
$1.6bC+
FCF
$845mC+
+6.4%C+
Rev
+10.0%B
—
D/E
0.69C+
14.7xA-
P/E
7.2xA
0.55A-
PEG
1.25B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DVA
UHS
67% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% below
~-17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~0%/yr
+165%
1-yr DCF upside
+17%
+207%
5-yr DCF upside
+23%
+282%
10-yr DCF upside
+32%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DVA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
UHS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
DVADaVita Inc.
Why now
Medical Care Facilities · market cap $11.1b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $247.49 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.55 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $218.43 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 136% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
ROE -154% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
UHSUniversal Health Services, Inc.
Why now
Medical Care Facilities · market cap $10.4b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $246.33 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $193.94 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DVA and UHS diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueDVA 69.9 · UHS 82.2UHS +12.3
- GrowthDVA 67.8 · UHS 58.6DVA +9.2
- QualityDVA 68.9 · UHS 68.4level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.