COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
SUZ vs UFPI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SUZ scored 54.8, UFPI scored 43.9 — SUZ leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. UFPI's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but SUZ's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
SUZ
Suzano S.A.
54.8
$8.78 · $10.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.9
SUZ leads
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
43.9
$89.83 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSUZ6.9x
- Fastest growthSUZ+5.7%
- Strongest balance sheetUFPI0.13
- Highest qualityUFPI63 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSUZ-27%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SUZ
stronger →← stronger
UFPI
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
37
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
32
UFPI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SUZ
UFPI
$951mC+
FCF
$267mC
+5.7%C+
Rev
-4.7%D+
1.99D
D/E
0.13A-
6.9xA
P/E
20.5xB
—
PEG
2.67C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SUZ
UFPI
27% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~13%/yr
+33%
1-yr DCF upside
-20%
+38%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
+45%
10-yr DCF upside
+48%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SUZ
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (BRL)
UFPI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
SUZSuzano S.A.
Why now
Paper & Paper Products · market cap $10.8b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $11.54 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $12.57 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
UFPIUFP Industries, Inc.
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $5.0b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $118.00 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $102.00 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 107% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SUZ and UFPI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.9 points in favor of SUZ. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueSUZ 98.1 · UFPI 31.6SUZ +66.5
- GrowthSUZ 37.3 · UFPI 42.6UFPI +5.3
- QualitySUZ 61.9 · UFPI 62.9level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.