COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
SSD vs UFPI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SSD scored 58.3, UFPI scored 43.9 — SSD leads.
Compare another set
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Company,
58.3
$188.77 · $7.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.4
SSD leads
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
43.9
$89.83 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestUFPI20.5x
- Fastest growthSSD+6.5%
- Strongest balance sheetUFPI0.13
- Highest qualitySSD83 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueUFPI-3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SSD
stronger →← stronger
UFPI
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
32
SSD is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SSD
UFPI
$468mC
FCF
$267mC
+6.5%C+
Rev
-4.7%D+
0.21B+
D/E
0.13A-
20.7xB
P/E
20.5xB
3.80D
PEG
2.67C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SSD
UFPI
28% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
~12%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~13%/yr
-26%
1-yr DCF upside
-20%
-22%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
-16%
10-yr DCF upside
+48%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SSD
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
UFPI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
SSDSimpson Manufacturing Company,
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $7.7b. 12% off the 52-week high of $213.49. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $219.00 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 124% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
UFPIUFP Industries, Inc.
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $5.0b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $118.00 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $102.00 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 107% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SSD and UFPI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.4 points in favor of SSD. The widest single difference is Quality, where SSD leads by 20.3 points.
- QualitySSD 83.2 · UFPI 62.9SSD +20.3
- ValueSSD 47.7 · UFPI 31.6SSD +16.1
- GrowthSSD 50.0 · UFPI 42.6SSD +7.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.