COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
SLVM vs UFPI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SLVM scored 34.3, UFPI scored 43.9 — UFPI leads.
Compare another set
SLVM
Sylvamo Corp
34.3
$36.79 · $1.5B
Score gap
9.6
UFPI leads
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
43.9
$89.83 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSLVM15.2x
- Fastest growthUFPI-4.7%
- Strongest balance sheetUFPI0.13
- Highest qualityUFPI63 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueUFPI-3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SLVM
stronger →← stronger
UFPI
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
15
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
51
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
32
UFPI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SLVM
UFPI
$10mC-
FCF
$267mC
-9.3%D
Rev
-4.7%D+
0.88B
D/E
0.13A-
15.2xB+
P/E
20.5xB
—
PEG
2.67C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SLVM
UFPI
913% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
~60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~13%/yr
-89%
1-yr DCF upside
-20%
-90%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
-92%
10-yr DCF upside
+48%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SLVM
No notable signals flagged.
UFPI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
SLVMSylvamo Corp
Why now
Paper & Forest · market cap $1.5b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $56.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -9% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Revenue contracting -9% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
UFPIUFP Industries, Inc.
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $5.0b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $118.00 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $102.00 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 107% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SLVM and UFPI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 9.6 points in favor of UFPI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthSLVM 14.7 · UFPI 42.6UFPI +27.9
- ValueSLVM 50.8 · UFPI 31.6SLVM +19.2
- QualitySLVM 54.2 · UFPI 62.9UFPI +8.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.