COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BCC vs UFPI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BCC scored 37.2, UFPI scored 43.9 — UFPI leads.
Compare another set
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
37.2
$82.47 · $2.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.7
UFPI leads
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
43.9
$89.83 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestUFPI20.5x
- Fastest growthBCC-1.5%
- Strongest balance sheetUFPI0.13
- Highest qualityUFPI63 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueUFPI-3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BCC
stronger →← stronger
UFPI
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
43
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
24
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
32
UFPI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BCC
UFPI
$103mC
FCF
$267mC
-1.5%D+
Rev
-4.7%D+
0.27B+
D/E
0.13A-
28.0xC+
P/E
20.5xB
2.94C
PEG
2.67C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BCC
UFPI
24% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
~20%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~13%/yr
-38%
1-yr DCF upside
-20%
-19%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
+21%
10-yr DCF upside
+48%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BCC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
UFPI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
BCCBoise Cascade Company
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $2.9b. 10% off the 52-week high of $91.97. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $96.50 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 1.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
UFPIUFP Industries, Inc.
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $5.0b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $118.00 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $102.00 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 107% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BCC and UFPI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.7 points in favor of UFPI. The widest single difference is Quality, where UFPI leads by 12.9 points.
- QualityBCC 50.0 · UFPI 62.9UFPI +12.9
- ValueBCC 24.1 · UFPI 31.6UFPI +7.5
- GrowthBCC 42.6 · UFPI 42.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.