COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
OMAB vs TXT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OMAB scored 66.1, TXT scored 70.5 — TXT leads.
Compare another set
OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
66.1
$104.22 · $5.0B
Score gap
4.4
TXT leads
TXT
Textron Inc.
70.5
$81.80 · $14.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTXT15.4x
- Fastest growthTXT+8.8%
- Strongest balance sheetTXT0.52
- Highest qualityOMAB90 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueOMAB-41%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OMAB
stronger →← stronger
TXT
90
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
88
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
OMAB is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OMAB
TXT
$401mC
FCF
$759mC+
+4.3%C+
Rev
+8.8%B
1.54C
D/E
0.52B+
15.5xA-
P/E
15.4xA-
0.76A-
PEG
1.11B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OMAB
TXT
41% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
5% below
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
+36%
1-yr DCF upside
-7%
+68%
5-yr DCF upside
+6%
+128%
10-yr DCF upside
+26%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OMAB
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
- Foreign reporter (MXN)
TXT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
OMABGrupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
Why now
Airports & Air Services · market cap $5.0b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $134.99 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.76 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $123.90 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 33% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 47% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 85% of earnings on a 5.6% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
TXTTextron Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $14.1b. 19% off the 52-week high of $101.57. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $102.07 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OMAB and TXT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.4 points in favor of TXT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityOMAB 89.8 · TXT 64.5OMAB +25.3
- GrowthOMAB 50.0 · TXT 75.1TXT +25.1
- ValueOMAB 88.2 · TXT 72.3OMAB +15.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.