COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
EXPE vs TXRH
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EXPE scored 67.9, TXRH scored 47.0 — EXPE leads.
Compare another set
EXPE
Expedia Group, Inc.
67.9
$339.13 · $40.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.9
EXPE leads
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
47
$205.29 · $13.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEXPE20.2x
- Fastest growthEXPE+12.0%
- Strongest balance sheetTXRH0.69
- Highest qualityEXPE85 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEXPE-44%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EXPE
stronger →← stronger
TXRH
85
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
16
EXPE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EXPE
TXRH
$4.5bB
FCF
$406mC
+12.0%B
Rev
+9.9%B
2.30C
D/E
0.69B+
20.2xB
P/E
32.7xC
1.00B+
PEG
2.46C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EXPE
TXRH
44% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
36% above
~-4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
+52%
1-yr DCF upside
-39%
+78%
5-yr DCF upside
-27%
+124%
10-yr DCF upside
-2%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EXPE
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
TXRH
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
EXPEExpedia Group, Inc.
Why now
Travel Services · market cap $40.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $341.09 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 35 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $336.23 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.30 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
TXRHTexas Roadhouse, Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $13.5b. 5% off the 52-week high of $216.30. 23 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $217.74 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 96% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EXPE and TXRH diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.9 points in favor of EXPE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueEXPE 74.0 · TXRH 15.7EXPE +58.3
- GrowthEXPE 50.0 · TXRH 81.5TXRH +31.5
- QualityEXPE 84.7 · TXRH 80.9EXPE +3.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.