COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
ADBE vs TWLO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADBE scored 89.1, TWLO scored 62.3 — ADBE leads.
Compare another set
ADBE
Adobe Inc.
89.1
$276.27 · $109.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.8
ADBE leads
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
62.3
$222.59 · $34.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestADBE15.8x
- Fastest growthTWLO+17.8%
- Strongest balance sheetTWLO0.12
- Highest qualityADBE92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueADBE-23%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADBE
stronger →← stronger
TWLO
92
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
57
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
89
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
66
ADBE is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADBE
TWLO
$10.3bA-
FCF
$1.0bC+
+11.5%B
Rev
+17.8%B+
0.61C+
D/E
0.12B+
15.8xA-
P/E
30.8xB
0.67A-
PEG
0.39A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADBE
TWLO
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
131% above
~2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~32%/yr
+15%
1-yr DCF upside
-62%
+29%
5-yr DCF upside
-57%
+52%
10-yr DCF upside
-47%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADBE
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
TWLO
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
ADBEAdobe Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $109.8b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $370.86 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 34 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $270.61 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 63% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
TWLOTwilio Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $34.2b. 14% off the 52-week high of $258.35. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.39 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 31 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $250.08 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. SaaS displacement — recurring revenue is sticky in good times but accelerates in churn during a downturn as customers consolidate vendors and renegotiate seat counts.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADBE and TWLO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.8 points in favor of ADBE. The widest single difference is Quality, where ADBE leads by 34.8 points.
- QualityADBE 92.0 · TWLO 57.2ADBE +34.8
- ValueADBE 89.5 · TWLO 65.5ADBE +24.0
- GrowthADBE 85.8 · TWLO 64.6ADBE +21.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.