Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TU scored 27.2, KYIV scored 72.0 — KYIV leads.
Compare another set
TU
TELUS Corporation
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
27.2
$7.72 · $12.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
44.8
KYIV leads
KYIV
Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
72
$12.10 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthKYIV+25.9%
Strongest balance sheetKYIV0.39
Highest qualityKYIV67 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueKYIV-56%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TU
stronger →← stronger
KYIV
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
20
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
87
24
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
KYIV is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TU
KYIV
$1.4bC+
FCF
$311mC
+0.6%C
Rev
+25.9%A-
2.24C
D/E
0.39B+
0.9xA-
P/S
—
13.44D
PEG
1.21B
—
P/E
17.3xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TU
KYIV
49% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
56% below
~-14%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-8%/yr
+106%
1-yr DCF upside
+88%
+97%
5-yr DCF upside
+125%
+86%
10-yr DCF upside
+192%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TU
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Cut its dividend
Foreign reporter (CAD)
KYIV
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Short track record
The companies
TUTELUS Corporation
Telecom Services · $7.72 · beta 0.77
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $12.2b. Down 50% from 52-week high of $15.41 — deep drawdown territory. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $10.33 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.24 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 50% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 283% of earnings on a 6.6% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
KYIVKyivstar Group Ltd.
Telecom Services · $12.10
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $2.8b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $16.55 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $17.93 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TU and KYIV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 44.8 points in favor of KYIV. The widest single difference is Growth, where KYIV leads by 67.6 points.
GrowthTU 19.5 · KYIV 87.1KYIV +67.6
ValueTU 24.1 · KYIV 73.5KYIV +49.4
QualityTU 49.7 · KYIV 67.1KYIV +17.4
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is KYIV or TU the better stock?
KYIV scores higher: KYIV 72.0, TU 27.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do KYIV and TU differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where KYIV leads by 68 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. KYIV leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are KYIV and TU scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.