COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LPG vs TRMD
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LPG scored 68.8, TRMD scored 53.9 — LPG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. LPG's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but TRMD's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
LPG
Dorian LPG Ltd.
68.8
$51.13 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.9
LPG leads
TRMD
TORM plc Class A Common Stock
53.9
$31.80 · $3.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLPG6.8x
- Fastest growthLPG+81.1%
- Strongest balance sheetTRMD0.48
- Highest qualityLPG86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLPG-39%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LPG
stronger →← stronger
TRMD
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
44
76
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
52
LPG is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LPG
TRMD
$239mC
FCF
$190mC
+81.1%A
Rev
-14.1%D
0.52B
D/E
0.48B
6.8xA-
P/E
9.3xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LPG
TRMD
39% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
40% above
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
+83%
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
+64%
5-yr DCF upside
-29%
+40%
10-yr DCF upside
-38%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LPG
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
TRMD
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Cut its dividend
The companies
LPGDorian LPG Ltd.
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $2.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $52.10 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +81% — in hypergrowth territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $51.80 (implying +1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 55% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
TRMDTORM plc Class A Common Stock
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $3.3b. 10% off the 52-week high of $35.33. Revenue -14% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Revenue contracting -14% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LPG and TRMD diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.9 points in favor of LPG. The widest single difference is Value, where LPG leads by 23.7 points.
- ValueLPG 75.5 · TRMD 51.8LPG +23.7
- QualityLPG 86.1 · TRMD 69.6LPG +16.5
- GrowthLPG 50.0 · TRMD 43.5LPG +6.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.