COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
TRGP vs VG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TRGP scored 52.4, VG scored 51.3 — TRGP leads.
Compare another set
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
52.4
$299.10 · $64.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.1
TRGP leads
VG
Venture Global, Inc.
51.3
$14.19 · $35.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthVG+100.7%
- Strongest balance sheetVG3.55
- Highest qualityTRGP77 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TRGP
stronger →← stronger
VG
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
53
41
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
45
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
51
VG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TRGP
VG
$741mC+
FCF
-$7.0bF
-2.0%D+
Rev
+100.7%A
5.16D
D/E
3.55D
28.6xC
P/E
—
1.25B
PEG
0.87B+
—
P/S
2.1xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TRGP
VG
336% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~42%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-78%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-77%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-76%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TRGP
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
VG
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
The companies
TRGPTarga Resources Corp.
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $64.1b. Trading near 52-week high of $307.94 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $305.24 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 62% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $64.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 5.16 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
VGVenture Global, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $35.5b. 19% off the 52-week high of $17.62. Revenue growing +101% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.42 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 3.55 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$7.0b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TRGP and VG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.1 points in favor of TRGP. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityTRGP 77.3 · VG 52.5TRGP +24.8
- GrowthTRGP 41.1 · VG 50.0VG +8.9
- ValueTRGP 45.2 · VG 51.3VG +6.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.