COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LPG vs TRGP
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LPG scored 68.8, TRGP scored 52.4 — LPG leads.
Compare another set
LPG
Dorian LPG Ltd.
68.8
$51.13 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.4
LPG leads
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
52.4
$299.10 · $64.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLPG6.8x
- Fastest growthLPG+81.1%
- Strongest balance sheetLPG0.52
- Highest qualityLPG86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLPG-39%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
LPG
stronger →← stronger
TRGP
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
41
76
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
45
LPG is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LPG
TRGP
$239mC
FCF
$741mC+
+81.1%A
Rev
-2.0%D+
0.52B
D/E
5.16D
6.8xA-
P/E
28.6xC
—
PEG
1.25B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
LPG
TRGP
39% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
336% above
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~42%/yr
+83%
1-yr DCF upside
-78%
+64%
5-yr DCF upside
-77%
+40%
10-yr DCF upside
-76%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
LPG
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
TRGP
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
LPGDorian LPG Ltd.
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $2.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $52.10 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +81% — in hypergrowth territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $51.80 (implying +1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 55% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
TRGPTarga Resources Corp.
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $64.1b. Trading near 52-week high of $307.94 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $305.24 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 62% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $64.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 5.16 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where LPG and TRGP diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.4 points in favor of LPG. The widest single difference is Value, where LPG leads by 30.3 points.
- ValueLPG 75.5 · TRGP 45.2LPG +30.3
- GrowthLPG 50.0 · TRGP 41.1LPG +8.9
- QualityLPG 86.1 · TRGP 77.3LPG +8.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.