COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
TREX vs WMS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TREX scored 73.0, WMS scored 72.6 — TREX leads.
Compare another set
TREX
Trex Company, Inc.
73
$45.77 · $4.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.4
TREX leads
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
72.6
$136.99 · $10.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestWMS23.3x
- Fastest growthWMS+10.4%
- Strongest balance sheetTREX0.30
- Highest qualityTREX88 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TREX
stronger →← stronger
WMS
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
65
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
59
TREX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TREX
WMS
$208mC
FCF
$550mC+
+7.0%C+
Rev
+10.4%B
0.30A-
D/E
0.97C+
27.1xB
P/E
23.3xB+
1.00B+
PEG
1.33B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TREX
WMS
64% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
15% above
~22%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~14%/yr
-47%
1-yr DCF upside
-27%
-39%
5-yr DCF upside
-13%
-27%
10-yr DCF upside
+12%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TREX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
WMS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
TREXTrex Company, Inc.
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $4.7b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $66.06 — deep drawdown territory. 18 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $54.67 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
WMSAdvanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $10.3b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $179.31 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $183.92 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 122% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TREX and WMS diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthTREX 68.0 · WMS 80.1WMS +12.1
- QualityTREX 88.2 · WMS 80.9TREX +7.3
- ValueTREX 64.9 · WMS 59.0TREX +5.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.