COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
TIGO vs TMUS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TIGO scored 59.1, TMUS scored 71.4 — TMUS leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. TMUS's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but TIGO's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
TIGO
Millicom International Cellular S.A.
59.1
$93.68 · $15.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.3
TMUS leads
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
71.4
$183.04 · $196.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTMUS19.2x
- Fastest growthTMUS+9.7%
- Strongest balance sheetTMUS2.14
- Highest qualityTIGO76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueTMUS-48%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TIGO
stronger →← stronger
TMUS
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
47
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
TMUS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TIGO
TMUS
$1.1bC+
FCF
$18.4bA-
+0.3%C
Rev
+9.7%B
4.85D
D/E
2.14C
23.4xB
P/E
19.2xB
0.51A-
PEG
0.84B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TIGO
TMUS
43% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
48% below
~1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
+33%
1-yr DCF upside
+59%
+76%
5-yr DCF upside
+93%
+164%
10-yr DCF upside
+157%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TIGO
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
TMUS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
TIGOMillicom International Cellular S.A.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $15.7b. 13% off the 52-week high of $107.13. PEG 0.51 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $98.39 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 38% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.85 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $196.3b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $258.66 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.84 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $243.38 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 174% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $196.3b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 2.14 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
TMUS leads TIGO by 11.1 points (73.4 to 62.3), its sharpest advantage coming in FCF (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer TIGO, which trades about 41% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TIGO and TMUS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.3 points in favor of TMUS. The widest single difference is Growth, where TMUS leads by 27.2 points.
- GrowthTIGO 46.7 · TMUS 73.9TMUS +27.2
- ValueTIGO 57.8 · TMUS 66.8TMUS +9.0
- QualityTIGO 76.2 · TMUS 73.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.