COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CHTR vs TMUS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHTR scored 56.0, TMUS scored 71.4 — TMUS leads.
Compare another set
CHTR
Charter Communications, Inc.
56
$150.17 · $20.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
15.4
TMUS leads
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
71.4
$183.04 · $196.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCHTR3.9x
- Fastest growthTMUS+9.7%
- Strongest balance sheetTMUS2.14
- Highest qualityTMUS74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCHTR-78%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHTR
stronger →← stronger
TMUS
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
37
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
75
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
TMUS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHTR
TMUS
$4.4bB
FCF
$18.4bA-
-1.5%D+
Rev
+9.7%B
4.42D
D/E
2.14C
3.9xA
P/E
19.2xB
0.96B+
PEG
0.84B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHTR
TMUS
78% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
48% below
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
+338%
1-yr DCF upside
+59%
+357%
5-yr DCF upside
+93%
+387%
10-yr DCF upside
+157%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHTR
No notable signals flagged.
TMUS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CHTRCharter Communications, Inc.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $20.2b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $285.82 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 17 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $184.41 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.42 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $196.3b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $258.66 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.84 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $243.38 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 174% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $196.3b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 2.14 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHTR and TMUS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 15.4 points in favor of TMUS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCHTR 37.4 · TMUS 73.9TMUS +36.5
- QualityCHTR 62.2 · TMUS 73.6TMUS +11.4
- ValueCHTR 75.2 · TMUS 66.8CHTR +8.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.