COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
TLK vs VEON
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TLK scored 45.2, VEON scored 56.5 — VEON leads.
Compare another set
TLK
Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
45.2
$15.20 · $15.0B
Score gap
11.3
VEON leads
VEON
VEON Ltd.
56.5
$62.34 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTLK14.9x
- Fastest growthVEON+9.9%
- Strongest balance sheetTLK0.60
- Highest qualityTLK81 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueVEON-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TLK
stronger →← stronger
VEON
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
78
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
69
31
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
34
VEON is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TLK
VEON
$2.3bB
FCF
$620mC+
-2.2%D+
Rev
+9.9%B
0.60B
D/E
3.05C
14.9xB+
P/E
62.3xC
3.57D
PEG
2.23C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TLK
VEON
50% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~-16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
+114%
1-yr DCF upside
+70%
+100%
5-yr DCF upside
+113%
+82%
10-yr DCF upside
+191%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TLK
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Revenue shrinking
- Foreign reporter (IDR)
VEON
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
TLKPerusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $15.0b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $23.52 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 123% of earnings on a 8.1% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
VEONVEON Ltd.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $4.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $63.29 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $83.59 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 105% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 3.05 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trailing P/E 62.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TLK and VEON diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.3 points in favor of VEON. The widest single difference is Growth, where VEON leads by 18.6 points.
- GrowthTLK 50.0 · VEON 68.6VEON +18.6
- QualityTLK 81.0 · VEON 78.2level
- ValueTLK 31.3 · VEON 33.7level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.